中国媒介生物学及控制杂志 ›› 2009, Vol. 20 ›› Issue (4): 375-376.

• 争鸣 • 上一篇    下一篇

对“四害”常用密度监测方法的评述和建议

黄谊1,黄河2   

  1. 1 湖南省疾病预防控制中心杀虫灭鼠科(长沙 410005); 2 中南大学湘雅医学院
  • 收稿日期:2009-05-05 出版日期:2009-08-20 发布日期:2009-08-20
  • 通讯作者: 黄河,Email: huanghe@xysm.net
  • 作者简介:黄谊(1973-),女,副主任技师,从事媒介生物防治研究。

Evaluation on density surveillance methods of four pests

 HUANG Yi, HUANG He   

  1. Hunan Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Changsha, Hunan 410005, China
  • Received:2009-05-05 Online:2009-08-20 Published:2009-08-20
  • Contact: HUANG He, Email: huanghe@xysm.net

摘要:

  【摘要】 目的 对目前鼠、蚊、蝇、蜚蠊常见密度监测方法进行评述,并提出建议。方法 从监测的种类、器械、数据、范围及监测的类型等方面对各种监测方法进行比较。结果 各种监测方法在监测种类、所需器械、数据的准确性、适用的监测类型等方面存在差异。结论 监测时,应根据监测目的、实施条件等选择合适的方法。

关键词: 鼠, 蚊, 蜚蠊, 密度, 监测

Abstract:

  【Abstract】 Objective To evaluate common density surveillance methods of rat, mosquito, fly and cockroach. Methods Different surveillance methods were compared from the sides of monitoring species, monitoring instruments, monitoring data, monitoring areas, and monitoring styles. Results There are differences in monitoring species, monitoring instruments, data accuracy and the applicability among different methods. Conclusion The surveillance method should be chosen according to the object of monitoring and practice condition.

Key words: Rat, Mosquito, Fly, Cockroach, Density, Monitoring

中图分类号: