中国媒介生物学及控制杂志 ›› 2025, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (1): 18-21.DOI: 10.11853/j.issn.1003.8280.2025.01.004

• 实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

化学引诱剂与CO2在野外环境对蚊虫诱集效果的研究

邓惠, 段金花, 芦瑞鹏, 陈宗晶, 程明基, 胡盛钧, 沈秀婷, 钟昱文   

  1. 广东省疾病预防控制中心消毒与病媒生物预防控制所, 广东 广州 511430
  • 收稿日期:2024-02-29 出版日期:2025-02-20 发布日期:2025-03-05
  • 通讯作者: 钟昱文,E-mail:yu0106@163.com
  • 作者简介:邓惠,女,博士,主管技师,主要从事病媒防控研究,E-mail:dh2582@126.com
  • 基金资助:
    广东省医学科研基金(B2022330,B2023035)

A study of the effectiveness of chemical attractants and carbon dioxide in attracting and trapping mosquitos in the field

DENG Hui, DUAN Jin-hua, LU Rui-peng, CHENG Zong-jing, CHENG Ming-ji, HU Sheng-jun, SHEN Xiu-ting, ZHONG Yu-wen   

  1. Institute of Disinfection and Vector Control, Guangdong Provincial Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Guangzhou, Guangdong 511430, China
  • Received:2024-02-29 Online:2025-02-20 Published:2025-03-05
  • Supported by:
    Medical Research Fund Project of Guangdong (No. B2022330, B2023035)

摘要: 目的 通过在大型居民区开展蚊虫诱集试验,比较3种化学引诱剂(引诱剂A、B、C)、CO2与引诱剂组合对常见蚊虫的诱集效果,为化学引诱剂与CO2在蚊虫监测与防制现场的应用提供科学依据。方法 3种引诱剂连续10 d诱集野外蚊虫,分析逐日诱集能力;采用拉丁方设计、交叉试验方法,分别进行引诱剂、引诱剂联合150 ml/min流量CO2诱集蚊虫试验,进行方差分析和秩和检验,分析引诱剂和CO2对蚊虫的诱集效果,以及CO2对引诱剂诱集蚊虫种类、性别的影响。结果 引诱剂A、B、C连续10 d平均诱集蚊虫分别为220.00、203.67和16.67只,每日最高诱捕数分别为46、49和5只;引诱剂A、双份引诱剂A、引诱剂A联合150 ml/min流量CO2分别诱集蚊虫358、784和1 268只,三组间诱集数量两两比较差异均有统计学意义(均P<0.05);引诱剂A、B各自联合150 ml/min流量CO2增强了诱蚊效果,与引诱剂A、B单独使用对致倦库蚊和白纹伊蚊及其雌蚊和雄蚊的诱集差异均有统计学意义(均P<0.001)。结论 化学引诱剂A、B在野外环境诱捕蚊虫具有一定的持效性,联合CO2的增效比提高引诱剂份量更强,可应用于蚊虫监测与防制工作。

关键词: 蚊虫引诱剂, CO2, 现场试验, 诱捕, 白纹伊蚊, 致倦库蚊

Abstract: Objective To compare the effectiveness of three chemical attractants (A, B, and C) and carbon dioxide (CO2) as well as their combinations in attracting and trapping common mosquitos by conducting experiments in large residential areas, so as to provide a scientific basis for the application of chemical attractants and CO2 in mosquito surveillance and control. Methods Mosquito attracting and trapping experiments were conducted in the field using three attractants over 10 consecutive days. The mosquito attracting and trapping abilities were analyzed for each day. Experiments with the attractants and combination of the attractants and 150 ml/min flow CO2 were conducted using Latin square design and cross-over method. Analysis of variance and rank sum test were performed to evaluate the effectiveness of the attractants and CO2 in mosquito attracting and trapping, as well as the impact of CO2 on the species and sex of mosquitos attracted and trapped. Results The average numbers of mosquitos attracted and trapped by attractants A, B, and C over 10 consecutive days were 220.00, 203.67, and 16.67, respectively, with the maximum number being 46, 49, and 5 per day, respectively. Attractant A, double attractant A, and attractant A combined with 150 ml/min flow CO2 attracted and trapped 358, 784, and 1 268 mosquitos, respectively, with significant differences in any two of the three groups (all P<0.05). Attractants A and B combined with 150 ml/min flow CO2 respectively enhanced the effectiveness of attracting mosquitos, with significant differences observed in Culex pipiens quinquefasciatus and Aedes albopictus (all P<0.001) and between the female and male mosquitoes ofthem(all P<0.001). Conclusions Chemical attractants have a certain lasting effect in trapping mosquitos in the field. The combination of attractants with CO2 can enhance the trapping effect more significantly than increasing the portion of attractants, making them applicable in mosquito surveillance and control.

Key words: Mosquito attractant, Carbon dioxide, Field test, Trapping, Aedes albopictus, Culex pipiens quinquefasciatus

中图分类号: