中国媒介生物学及控制杂志 ›› 2024, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (2): 244-248.DOI: 10.11853/j.issn.1003.8280.2024.02.020

• 调查研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

中缅边境地区中华按蚊杀虫剂抗药性调查研究

曹自有1, 田鹏2, 戴雨琪1, 尹建海1, 夏志贵1, 林祖锐2   

  1. 1. 中国疾病预防控制中心寄生虫病预防控制所疟疾室, 国家热带病研究中心, 世界卫生组织热带病合作中心, 科技部国家级热带病国际联合研究中心, 国家卫生健康委寄生虫病原与媒介生物学重点实验室, 上海 200025;
    2. 云南省虫媒传染病防控研究重点实验室, 云南省热带传染病国际联合实验室, 云南省虫媒传染病防控 关键技术创新团队, 云南省寄生虫病防治所, 云南 普洱 655000
  • 收稿日期:2023-10-18 出版日期:2024-04-20 发布日期:2024-05-09
  • 通讯作者: 林祖锐,E-mail:964786374@qq.com
  • 作者简介:曹自有,男,在读硕士,主要从事媒介生物学及控制研究,E-mail:caoziyou2021@163.com

Insecticides resistance of Anopheles sinensis in China-Myanmar border areas

CAO Zi-you1, TIAN Peng2, DAI Yu-qi1, YIN Jian-hai1, XIA Zhi-gui1, LIN Zu-rui2   

  1. 1. Department of Malaria Control, National Institute of Parasitic Diseases, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Chinese Center for Tropical Diseases Research, WHO Collaborating Centre for Tropical Diseases, National Center for International Research on Tropical Diseases, Minisitry of Science and Technology, NHC Key Laboratory of Parasite and Vector Biology, Shanghai 200025, China;
    2. Yunnan Provincial Key Laboratory of Vector-borne Diseases Control and Research, Yunnan International Laboratory for Tropical Infectious Diseases, Yunnan Innovative Team of Key Techniques for Vector Borne Disease Control and Prevention, Yunnan Institute of Parasitic Diseases, Pu'er, Yunnan 665000, China
  • Received:2023-10-18 Online:2024-04-20 Published:2024-05-09

摘要: 目的 了解中缅边境地区中华按蚊成蚊对杀虫剂的抗药性现状,为中国消除疟疾后该区域的媒介控制提供科学依据。方法 2023年7月4-26日,在中缅边境地区选取腾冲市、沧源佤族自治县(沧源县)和盈江县作为监测县,在每个县选择1个适宜中华按蚊孳生的自然村作为调查点。每个调查点采集不少于800只雌性吸血中华按蚊带回实验室,次日采用世界卫生组织(WHO)推荐的成蚊接触筒诊断剂量法测定蚊虫对9种杀虫剂的抗性。设立空白对照组,每种剂量杀虫剂重复测定3次取均值,记录杀虫剂接触时间、首只蚊虫击倒时间、60 min蚊虫击倒数以及24 h蚊虫死亡数,计算首只蚊虫击倒时间均值、60 min击倒率、半数击倒时间(KT50)和24 h校正死亡率,χ2检验分别比较3个调查点试虫对每种杀虫剂的24 h校正死亡率差异。杀虫剂标准品和WHO推荐的成蚊接触筒均由中国疾病预防控制中心传染病预防控制所媒介生物控制室提供。结果 3个监测县共完成2 224只中华按蚊的测定,共测定0.05 %溴氰菊酯、0.15 %高效氯氟氰菊酯、0.15 %高效氟氯氰菊酯、5 %马拉硫磷、0.5 %氯菊酯、1 %杀螟硫磷、0.1 %噁虫威、0.1 %残杀威和0.06 %氟虫腈9种杀虫剂。结果显示,沧源县调查点中华按蚊成蚊的24 h平均校正死亡率分别为25.68 %、26.58 %、46.67 %、100 %、39.19 %、86.75 %、55.29 %、35.96 %和25.40 %;腾冲市调查点中华按蚊成蚊的24 h平均校正死亡率分别为40.40 %、44.58 %、34.74 %、96.05 %、5.00 %、97.00 %、44.19 %、27.96 %和63.41 %;盈江县调查点中华按蚊成蚊的24 h平均校正死亡率分别为39.73 %、49.41 %、53.95 %、100 %、26.47 %、100 %、91.67 %、100 %和43.37 %。3个调查点试虫对0.15 %高效氯氟氰菊酯、0.15 %高效氟氯氰菊酯、0.5 %氯菊酯、1 %杀螟硫磷、0.1 %噁虫威、0.1 % 残杀威和0.06 %氟虫腈7种杀虫剂的24 h平均校正死亡率之间差异均有统计学意义(均P<0.05)。结论 中缅边境调查地区中华按蚊对多种杀虫剂已产生抗性,应根据监测结果及时调整杀虫剂的使用,在稳定控制疟疾媒介按蚊的同时延缓杀虫剂抗性的产生和发展。

关键词: 中华按蚊, 杀虫剂, 抗药性, 中缅边境

Abstract: Objective To investigate the current status of insecticide resistance of Anopheles sinensis in China-Myanmar border areas, so as to provide scientific basis for vector control in this region after malaria elimination in China.Methods From July 4 to 26, 2023, in Tengchong City, Cangyuan Wa Autonomous County (Cangyuan), and Yingjiang County along the China-Myanmar border, one natural villages each suitable for An. sinensis breeding were selected as investigation points. At each survey point, no less than 800 female blood-sucking An. sinensis mosquitoes were collected and brought back to the laboratory, and on the following day, mosquito resistance to nine insecticides was measured using the WHO tube test. Blank control were set up, and three replicates were conducted for each dose of insecticides. The contact time of the insecticide, the first mosquito strike time, the 60 min mosquito strike count, and the number of mosquito deaths at 24 h were recorded. The mean first knockdown time, knockdown rate at 60 min, median knockdown time (KT50), and 24 h corrected mortality were caculated. The Chi-square test was used to compare the 24 h corrected mortality of test insects for each insecticide at the three survey sites. The reference insecticides and the WHO-recommended tubes were both provided by the department of vector biology and control, national institute for communicable disease control and prevention, Chinese center for disease control and prevention.Results The resistance of a total of 2 224 An. sinensis mosquitoes were measured at three surveillance counties to nine insecticides including 0.05 % deltamethrin, 0.15 % lambda-cyhalothrin, 0.15 % beta-cyfluthrin, 5 % malathion, 0.5 % permethrin, 1 % fenitrothion, 0.1 % bendiocarb, 0.1 % propoxur, and 0.06 % fipronil. At Cangyuan survey point, the 24 h average corrected mortality rates of An. sinensis adults were 25.68 %, 26.58 %, 46.67 %, 100 %, 39.19 %, 86.75 %, 55.29 %, 35.96 %, and 25.40 % for the nine insecticides, respectively; at Tengchong survey point, the 24 h average corrected mortality rates were 40.40 %, 44.58 %, 34.74 %, 96.05 %, 5.00 %, 97.00 %, 44.19 %, 27.96 %, and 63.41 %, respectively; at Yingjiang survey point, the 24 h average corrected mortality rates were 39.73 %, 49.41 %, 53.95 %, 100 %, 26.47 %, 100 %, 91.67 %, 100 %, and 43.37 %, respectively. There were significant differences in the 24 h average corrected mortality rate between the three surveillance points for seven insecticides, including 0.15 % lambda-cyhalothrin, 0.15 % beta-cyfluthrin, 0.5 % permethrin, 1 % fenitrothion, 0.1 % bendiocarb, 0.1 % propoxur, and 0.06 % fipronil (all P<0.05).Conclusions In the surveyed areas along the China-Myanmar border, An. sinensis has developed resistance to multiple insecticides, and the use of insecticides should be adjusted according to surveillance results to delay the occurence and development of insecticide resistance while effectively controlling the malaria vectors.

Key words: Anopheles sinensis, Insecticides, Resistance, China-Myanmar border

中图分类号: