关键词: 病媒生物生态监测, 质量评价, 符合率

Abstract: Objective To evaluate vector surveillance at municipal and county levels in Hebei province, China, and to find out quality problems in the surveillance work to guide the improvement of surveillance work and its quality in Hebei province. Methods The vector surveillance specimens from 57 municipal and county quality control points were checked, and the compliance rate of surveillance data was calculated. The scores of 8 quality evaluation indicators of each quality control point were quantified, and the t-test, Mann-Whitney U test, and Friedman Q-test were used to analyze the compliance level of monitoring. Results In Hebei province, the mean compliance rate of rodent surveillance data was (80.95±40.07)% at the municipal level and (78.06±28.50)% at the county level. For mosquito surveillance data, the mean compliance rate was (77.84±27.76)% at the municipal level and (83.03±26.09)% at the county level. For fly surveillance data, the mean compliance rate was (84.27±11.67)% at the municipal level and (73.75±25.93)% at the county level. For cockroach surveillance data, the mean compliance rate was (95.59±8.53)% at the municipal level and (85.99±18.03)% at the county level. There were no significant differences in the compliance rates of the surveillance data of four vectors between the municipal level and county level (P>0.05). All 8 indicators reached the level of "relatively good" or higher at the municipal level, and 7 indicators at the county level. Both municipal and county quality control points had high scores in 4 indicators-the completion rate of surveillance points, the stability of surveillance personnel, the timeliness of reports, and the compliance rate of surveillance tools. The indicators to be improved for the municipal level were the standardization of report filling (3.09±0.80 points), the compliance rate of surveillance habitats (3.32±0.81 points), the compliance rate of surveillance data (3.46±1.06 points), and the compliance rate of surveillance time (3.64±0.98 points). The indicators to be improved for the county level were the compliance rate of surveillance data (2.94±1.79 points), the standardization of report filling (3.11±1.00 points), the compliance rate of surveillance habitats (3.30±1.32 points), and the compliance rate of surveillance time (3.46±1.11 points). Conclusion The overall quality of vector surveillance is good both at municipal and county levels in Hebei province, but quality control points at the same level show mixed surveillance qualities. Both municipal and county points should make up for the weak links to improve surveillance quality.

Key words: Vector bionomic surveillance, Quality evaluation, Compliance rate