巴尔通体在自然感染的啮齿动物组织中的分布

doi:10.11853/j.issn.1003.8280.2021.02.012

中国媒介生物学及控制杂志 ›› 2021, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (2): 181-187.DOI: 10.11853/j.issn.1003.8280.2021.02.012

巴尔通体在自然感染的啮齿动物组织中的分布

栗冬梅, 徐爱玲, 宋秀平, 李庆多, 康央, 刘起勇

中国疾病预防控制中心传染病预防控制所媒介生物控制室, 传染病预防控制国家重点实验室, 感染性疾病诊治协同创新中心, 北京 102206

收稿日期:2020-10-28 出版日期:2021-04-20 发布日期:2021-04-20
通讯作者: 刘起勇,E-mail:liuqiyong@icdc.cn
作者简介:栗冬梅,女,博士,研究员,主要从事病原生物学与疾病控制研究工作,E-mail:lidongmei@icdc.cn
基金资助:
国家科技重大专项（2017ZX10303404）

Bartonella distribution in naturally infected rodent tissues

LI Dong-mei, XU Ai-ling, SONG Xiu-ping, LI Qing-duo, KANG Yang, LIU Qi-yong

State Key Laboratory of Infectious Disease Prevention and Control, Collaborative Innovation Center for Diagnosis and Treatment of Infectious Diseases, Department of Vector Biology and Control, National Institute for Communicable Disease Control and Prevention, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Beijing 102206, China

Received:2020-10-28 Online:2021-04-20 Published:2021-04-20
Supported by:
Supported by the National Science and Technology Major Project of China (No. 2017ZX10303404)

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的调查自然感染状态下啮齿动物体内不同组织中巴尔通体的分布情况。方法 2018年5月应用夹夜法在黑龙江密山口岸周边捕获啮齿动物，采集心、肝、脾、肺和肾组织，匀浆后分离培养，提取疑似巴尔通体菌落核酸，PCR扩增枸橼酸合酶基因（gltA），进行测序分析，确定巴尔通体种类；分析比较心、肝、脾、肺和肾组织中的感染率及其差异。结果共捕获啮齿动物7种81只，其中，黑线姬鼠68只，占捕获总数的84.0%；其余为东方田鼠、莫氏田鼠和北花松鼠等。共计4种45只啮齿动物分离培养出巴尔通体，总感染率为55.6%。心、肝、脾、肺和肾各组织的感染率分别为38.3%（31/81）、39.5%（32/81）、42.0%（34/81）、32.1%（26/81）和45.7%（37/81），差异无统计学意义（χ²=5.623，P=0.229）。45株分离菌鉴定出7种巴尔通体，包括格拉汉姆巴尔通体、黑瞎子巴尔通体、日本巴尔通体、库珀巴尔通体、泰勒巴尔通体、地松鼠巴尔通体和1种尚未分类巴尔通体，以格拉汉姆巴尔通体为多（73.3%），在不同组织中均有分布，差异无统计学意义（χ²=7.492，P=0.112）。结论巴尔通体在啮齿动物中自然感染率较高，可同时侵袭不同组织，对多种组织的亲嗜性无差异，不受宿主动物和病原体的物种限制。

关键词: 巴尔通体, 自然感染, 啮齿动物, 组织亲嗜性

Abstract: Objective To investigate the distribution of Bartonella in different tissues of rodents with natural infections. Methods The night trapping method was used to capture rodents around Mishan Port of Heilongjiang province, China in May 2018. The heart, liver, spleen, lung, and kidney were homogenized and incubated, and Bartonella DNA was extracted from suspected colonies. Citrate synthase gene (gltA) was PCR-amplified and sequenced to determine the species of Bartonella. The infection rates of these tissues were analyzed and compared. Results A total of 81 rodents of seven species were captured, including Apodemus agrarius (68, 84.0%), Microtus fortis, M. maximowiczii, Tamias sibiricus, and others. Bartonella strains were isolated from 45 rodents of four species, with an overall infection rate of 55.6%. The infection rates of the heart, liver, spleen, lung, and kidney were 38.3% (31/81), 39.5% (32/81), 42.0% (34/81), 32.1% (26/81), and 45.7% (37/81), respectively, which were not significantly different from each other (χ²=5.623, P=0.229). The 45 isolates were identified as seven species of Bartonella, i.e., B. grahamii, B. heixiaziensis, B. japonica, B. coopersplainsensis, B. taylorii, B. washoensis, and a novel species. B. grahamii was the predominant species (73.3%) and was isolated from multiple tissues, though the differences were not statistically significant (χ²=7.492, P=0.112). Conclusion Bartonella has a high natural infection rate in rodents and can invade various tissues with similar tissue tropism, and the infection is not constrained by host and Bartonella species.

Key words: Bartonella, Natural infection, Rodent, Tissue tropism

中图分类号:

Q939.93
S443

栗冬梅, 徐爱玲, 宋秀平, 李庆多, 康央, 刘起勇. 巴尔通体在自然感染的啮齿动物组织中的分布[J]. 中国媒介生物学及控制杂志, 2021, 32(2): 181-187.

LI Dong-mei, XU Ai-ling, SONG Xiu-ping, LI Qing-duo, KANG Yang, LIU Qi-yong. Bartonella distribution in naturally infected rodent tissues[J]. Chines Journal of Vector Biology and Control, 2021, 32(2): 181-187.

参考文献

[1] Gutiérrez R,Krasnov B,Morick D,et al. Bartonella infection in rodents and their flea ectoparasites:an overview[J]. Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis,2015,15(1):27-39. DOI:10.1089/vbz. 2014.1606.
[2] Buffet JP,Kosoy M,Vayssier-Taussat M. Natural history of Bartonella-infecting rodents in light of new knowledge on genomics,diversity and evolution[J]. Future Microbiol,2013,8(9):1117-1128. DOI:10.2217/fmb.13.77.
[3] 马洁琼,栗冬梅,陈忠科,等. 鼠传巴尔通体流行概况[J]. 疾病监测,2018,33(1):7-14. DOI:10.3784/j.issn.1003-9961. 2018.01.004.Ma JQ,Li DM,Chen ZK,et al. Epidemiological characteristics of rodent-borne Bartonella[J]. Dis Surveill,2018,33(1):7-14. DOI:10.3784/j.issn.1003-9961.2018.01.004.
[4] Greub G,Raoult D. Bartonella:new explanations for old diseases[J]. J Med Microbiol,2002,51(11):915-923. DOI:10.1099/0022-1317-51-11-915.
[5] Iannino F,Salucci S,Di Provvido A,et al. Bartonella infections in humans dogs and cats[J]. Vet Ital,2018,54(1):63-72. DOI:10.12834/VetIt.398.1883.2.
[6] Eicher SC,Dehio C. Bartonella entry mechanisms into mammalian host cells[J]. Cell Microbiol,2012,14(8):1166-1173. DOI:10.1111/j.1462-5822.2012.01806.x.
[7] Dehio C. Bartonella-host-cell interactions and vascular tumour formation[J]. Nat Rev Microbiol,2005,3(8):621-631. DOI:10.1038/nrmicro1209.
[8] Okaro U,Addisu A,Casanas B,et al. Bartonella Species,an emerging cause of Blood-Culture-Negative endocarditis[J]. Clin Microbiol Rev,2017,30(3):709-746. DOI:10.1128/CMR. 00013-17.
[9] Gutiérrez R,Vayssier-Taussat M,Buffet JP,et al. Guidelines for the isolation,molecular detection,and characterization of Bartonella species[J]. Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis,2017,17(1):42-50. DOI:10.1089/vbz.2016.1956.
[10] Deng HK,Le Rhun D,Lecuelle B,et al. Role of the spleen in Bartonella spp. infection[J]. FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol,2012,64(1):143-145. DOI:10.1111/j.1574-695X.2011.00908.x.
[11] Corduneanu A,Sándor AD,Ionică AM,et al. Bartonella DNA in heart tissues of bats in central and eastern Europe and a review of phylogenetic relations of bat-associated Bartonellae[J]. Parasit Vectors,2018,11(1):489. DOI:10.1186/s13071-018-3070-7.
[12] Kehoe SP,Chomel BB,Stuckey MJ,et al. Zoonotic Bartonella species in cardiac valves of healthy coyotes,California,USA[J]. Emerg Infect Dis,2014,20(12):2133-2136. DOI:10.3201/eid2012.140578.
[13] Chomel BB,Kasten RW,Williams C,et al. Bartonella endocarditis:a pathology shared by animal reservoirs and patients[J]. Ann N Y Acad Sci,2009,1166:120-126. DOI:10.1111/j.1749-6632.2009.04523.x.
[14] Melenotte C,Edouard S,Lepidi H,et al. Diagnosis of infectious lymphadenitis[J]. Rev Med Interne,2015,36(10):668-676. DOI:10.1016/j.revmed.2015.04.004.
[15] Lin YY,Hsiao CH,Hsu YH,et al. Immunohistochemical study of lymph nodes in patients with cat scratch disease[J]. J Formos Med Assoc,2006,105(11):911-917. DOI:10.1016/S0929-6646(09)60176-5.
[16] Kordick DL,Brown TT,Shin K,et al. Clinical and pathologic evaluation of chronic Bartonella henselae or Bartonella clarridgeiae infection in cats[J]. J Clin Microbiol,1999,37(5):1536-1547. DOI:10.1128/JCM.37.5.1536-1547.1999.
[17] Norman AF,Regnery R,Jameson P,et al. Differentiation of Bartonella-like isolates at the species level by PCR-restriction fragment length polymorphism in the citrate synthase gene[J]. J Clin Microbiol,1995,33(7):1797-1803. DOI:10.1128/JCM. 33.7.1797-1803.1995.
[18] Florin TA,Zaoutis TE,Zaoutis LB. Beyond cat scratch disease:widening spectrum of Bartonella henselae infection[J]. Pediatrics,2008,121(5):e1413-e1425. DOI:10.1542/peds. 2007-1897.
[19] Nelson CA,Saha S,Mead PS. Cat-scratch disease in the United States,2005-2013[J]. Emerg Infect Dis,2016,22(10):1741-1746. DOI:10.3201/eid2210.160115.
[20] Gouriet F,Lepidi H,Habib G,et al. From cat scratch disease to endocarditis,the possible natural history of Bartonella henselae infection[J]. BMC Infect Dis,2007,7:30. DOI:10.1186/1471-2334-7-30.
[21] Li DM,Hou Y,Song XP,et al. High prevalence and genetic heterogeneity of rodent-borne Bartonella species on Heixiazi Island,China[J]. Appl Environ Microbiol,2015,81(23):7981-7992. DOI:10.1128/AEM.02041-15.
[22] 左双燕. 我国黑龙江林区鼠型动物巴尔通体感染调查与分离鉴定[D]. 长沙:中南大学,2012.Zuo SY. Detection and Isolation of Bartonella spp. in rodents in Helongjiang province of China[D]. Changsha:Central South University,2012.
[23] Kerkhoff FT,Bergmans AMC,van der Zee A,et al. Demonstration of Bartonella grahamii DNA in ocular fluids of a patient with neuroretinitis[J]. J Clin Microbiol,1999,37(12):4034-4038. DOI:10.1128/JCM.37.12.4034-4038.1999.
[24] Oksi J,Rantala S,Kilpinen S,et al. Cat scratch disease caused by Bartonella grahamii in an immunocompromised patient[J]. J Clin Microbiol,2013,51(8):2781-2784. DOI:10.1128/JCM. 00910-13.

巴尔通体在自然感染的啮齿动物组织中的分布

Bartonella distribution in naturally infected rodent tissues

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	刘郁桐, 刘雨杭, 袁道欢, 王宇杰, 秦姣, 王健, 陈鸿辉, 王英永, 陈再雄, 聂海燕, 刘全生. 广东韶关丹霞山国家级自然保护区内鼠种构成及分布调查分析[J]. 中国媒介生物学及控制杂志, 2022, 33(1): 94-99.
[2]	康东梅, 栗冬梅, 宋秀平, 张文竹, 刘起勇, 伦辛畅, 孟凤霞. 汉赛巴尔通体感染SD大鼠实验研究[J]. 中国媒介生物学及控制杂志, 2021, 32(6): 660-665.
[3]	母群征, 李欣颖, 刘蓉蓉, 杨军, 栗冬梅, 鲁亮, 李贵昌, 侯咏, 李明, 宋秀平, 孟凤霞, 刘起勇. 黑龙江省黑河市部分地区啮齿动物体表寄生恙螨调查[J]. 中国媒介生物学及控制杂志, 2021, 32(5): 570-575.
[4]	王卓, 吴琼, 金美松, 邢悦鹏, 杨义军, 吴益民. 中国长白山地区啮齿动物巴尔通体感染调查及基因型分析[J]. 中国媒介生物学及控制杂志, 2021, 32(5): 594-598.
[5]	栗冬梅, 周若冰, 李寿江, 鲁亮, 饶华祥, 宋秀平, 李庆多, 刘起勇. 纳米孔测序实时检测鼠传巴尔通体[J]. 中国媒介生物学及控制杂志, 2021, 32(4): 390-397.
[6]	饶华祥, 于娟, 李寿江, 宋秀平, 栗冬梅. 青藏高原麦秀国家森林公园小型哺乳动物巴尔通体基因多态性研究[J]. 中国媒介生物学及控制杂志, 2021, 32(4): 398-403.
[7]	贵有军, 王诚, 罗勇军, 阿布力克木·阿布都热西提, 王启果, 林军健, 卡斯木江·玉素甫, 李博, 雒涛. 准噶尔盆地北缘梭梭林区啮齿动物种群调查[J]. 中国媒介生物学及控制杂志, 2020, 31(6): 680-684.
[8]	康央, 李庆多, 苗娇娇, 宋秀平, 徐爱玲, 张雯, 栗冬梅. 应用微生物数据分析云平台筛选巴尔通体特异基因及设计探针[J]. 中国媒介生物学及控制杂志, 2020, 31(5): 526-530.
[9]	胡挺松, 胡秋凌, 李绍雄, 黄勇, 胡海梅, 高丽芬, 罗琼梅, 何永芝, 周永存, 张海林, 张富强. 云南省楚雄市2015-2018年肾综合征出血热流行特征及宿主动物调查[J]. 中国媒介生物学及控制杂志, 2020, 31(2): 152-157.
[10]	李晔, 蓝玉清, 柳付明, 潘孝猛. 中国啮齿目动物体表寄生蜱种类与地理分布回顾[J]. 中国媒介生物学及控制杂志, 2019, 30(6): 682-688.
[11]	魏怀波, 杨喜凤, 赵亚飞, 刘佳琪, 邬婧, 田丽, 吴秀兰, 乔舜. 内蒙古边境口岸地区啮齿动物种类及区系分布[J]. 中国媒介生物学及控制杂志, 2019, 30(6): 703-706.
[12]	郭丽民, 席进孝, 盖永志, 吴斌, 王世明, 苗克军, 穆洮霞, 徐大琴. 甘肃省鼠疫疫源地啮齿动物DNA条形码分析[J]. 中国媒介生物学及控制杂志, 2019, 30(2): 176-179.
[13]	栗冬梅, 徐兆楠, 朱彩英, 张政, 康央, 张洪江, 宋秀平, 唐承军, 葛军旗. 应用TaqMan探针实时荧光定量PCR法调查北京市部分城郊区鼠传病原体流行状况[J]. 中国媒介生物学及控制杂志, 2019, 30(1): 12-17.
[14]	李博, 岳锡宏, 卢珊, 雒涛, 王信惠, 黎唯. 新疆乌苏市古尔图地区长尾黄鼠感染巴尔通体情况调查[J]. 中国媒介生物学及控制杂志, 2018, 29(6): 567-570.
[15]	张琳, 苗广青, 侯学霞, 李博, 郝琴. 巢式PCR和实时荧光定量PCR在莱姆病宿主动物监测中的应用评价[J]. 中国媒介生物学及控制杂志, 2018, 29(5): 425-427.