云南省西双版纳州和缅甸掸邦傣族居民登革热知识和预防行为及其影响因素分析

doi:10.11853/j.issn.1003.8280.2020.01.012

中国媒介生物学及控制杂志 ›› 2020, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (1): 57-61.DOI: 10.11853/j.issn.1003.8280.2020.01.012

云南省西双版纳州和缅甸掸邦傣族居民登革热知识和预防行为及其影响因素分析

刘慧^1,2, 许建卫^1,2, 夏敏^1,2, 杨明东^1,2, 李建雄^1,2, 尹一杰^1,2, 董新炜^1,2

1 云南省寄生虫病防治所, 云南省疟疾研究中心, 云南省虫媒传染病防控研究重点实验室, 云南普洱 665000;
2 大理大学病原与媒介生物研究所, 云南大理 671003

收稿日期:2019-10-29 出版日期:2020-02-20 发布日期:2020-02-20
通讯作者: 许建卫,Email:xjw426@163.com
作者简介:刘慧,女,主任技师,主要从事寄生虫与虫媒病防制工作,Email:liubible@126.com
基金资助:
国家社会科学基金重点项目（16ASH004）

A comparative study of dengue fever-related knowledge level and preventive behaviors and their influencing factors in the Dai people between Xishuangbanna, Yunnan, China and Shan State Special Region 4, Myanmar

LIU Hui^1,2, XU Jian-wei^1,2, XIA Min^1,2, YANG Ming-dong^1,2, LI Jian-xiong^1,2, YIN Yi-jie^1,2, DONG Xin-wei^1,2

1 Yunnan Institute of Parasitic Diseases, Yunnan Provincial Centre of Malaria Research, Yunnan Provincial Key Laboratory of Vector-borne Diseases Control and Research, Pu'er 665000, Yunnan Province, China;
2 Institute of Pathogens and Vectors, Dali University

Received:2019-10-29 Online:2020-02-20 Published:2020-02-20
Supported by:
Supported by the National Social Science Fund of China (No. 16ASH004)

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的了解中缅边境傣族居民登革热知识和预防行为及其影响因素，为以社区为基础的登革热控制提供科学依据。方法 2017年12月至2018年4月，采用问卷调查的方法，对户主进行入户调查，重点人员深度访谈以及参与性观察相结合的方法，抽样调查云南省西双版纳傣族自治州（西双版纳州）和缅甸掸邦第四特区（SR4）2017年登革热发病高、中、低或无3类社区傣族登革热知识和预防行为及其影响因素。率的比较采用χ²检验，多因素logistic回归分析影响因素。结果在西双版纳州和缅甸SR4分别完成261和259份问卷调查表，并对18名关键人员进行深度访谈。西双版纳州傣族居民知晓登革热传播媒介为“花斑蚊”或伊蚊以及幼蚊孳生地为容器型积水的户主比例分别为76.08%（95% CI：70.44%～81.23%）和89.07%（95% CI：84.53%～92.70%），报告经常翻盆倒罐家庭比例为94.64%（95% CI：91.20%～97.01%），缅甸SR4依次分别为14.29%（95% CI：10.19%～19.10%）、24.32%（95% CI：19.22%～30.02%）和72.76%（95% CI：64.44%～79.83%）。西双版纳州傣族居民登革热知识水平和登革热预防行为显著高于缅甸SR4（χ²=41.004，P<0.001）；logistic回归分析结果显示，西双版纳发生过登革热的社区开展媒介控制的家庭更多（OR=23.90，95% CI：3.07～185.82），以农业为主要家庭经济收入家庭较少开展媒介控制（OR=0.14，95% CI：0.03～0.63）。缅甸SR4发生过登革热社区开展媒介控制家庭更少（OR=0.08，95% CI：0.02～0.36）；户主年龄、登革热知识及其对登革热敏感性也可影响SR4登革热预防行为（均P<0.05）。结论西双版纳傣族居民登革热知识水平较高，但需进一步加强管理来保持预防行为；缅甸SR4除需加强组织保障外，尚需通过行为改变提高登革热知识，促进预防行为。

关键词: 登革热, 知识, 预防行为, 影响因素, 中缅边境

Abstract: Objective To investigate dengue fever-related knowledge level and preventive behaviors and their influencing factors in the Dai people in China-Myanmar border areas, and to provide a scientific basis for community-based dengue fever prevention and control in the border areas. Methods From December 2017 to April 2018, dengue fever-related knowledge level and preventive behaviors of the Dai people and the influencing factors were investigated using sampling questionnaire survey (household survey of householders) combined with in-depth interview of key opinion leaders (KOLs) and participatory observation in three types of communities (classified according to the incidence of dengue fever in 2017, i.e., high, medium, and low or none) in Xishuangbanna (XSBN), Yunnan province, China and Shan State Special Region 4 (SR4), Myanmar. The awareness rates were compared using chi-square test, and the influencing factors were analyzed by multivariate logistic regression. Results A total of 259 and 261 questionnaires were completed in XSBN and SR4 of Myanmar, respectively. Eighteen KOLs were interviewed in depth. In XSBN, the proportion of householders who knew that spotted mosquitoes or Aedes mosquitoes are vectors for dengue fever and the proportion of householders who knew that water containers are breeding sites of Aedes mosquitoes and their larvae were 76.08% (95%CI:70.44%-81.23%) and 89.07% (95%CI:84.53%-92.70%), respectively; the proportion of households which were reported to have a habit of turning over pots was 94.64%(95%CI:91.20%-97.01%). In SR4 of Myanmar, the above three proportions were 14.29%(95%CI:10.19%-19.10%), 24.32%(95%CI:19.22%-30.02%) and 72.76%(95%CI:64.44%-79.83%), respectively. The dengue fever-related knowledge level and preventive behavior performance rate of the Dai people were significantly higher in XSBN than in SR4 of Myanmar (χ²=41.004, P<0.001). The results of a logistic regression analysis showed that there were a higher dengue fever vector control performance rate in communities historically struck by dengue fever (OR=23.90, 95%CI:3.07-185.82) and a lower vector control performance rate in households taking agriculture as their main economic source (OR=0.14, 95%CI:0.03-0.63) in XSBN. There was a lower vector control performance rate of households in communities historically struck by dengue fever in SR4 of Myanmar (OR=0.08, 95%CI:0.02-0.36). Age, dengue fever-related knowledge level, and awareness of the disease of householders may also influence preventive behaviors against dengue fever in SR4 (all, P<0.05). Conclusion The Dai people in XSBN have a higher knowledge level of dengue fever, but their preventive behaviors need to be maintained by strengthened management. The preventive behaviors of the inhabitants in SR4 of Myanmar need to be boosted by further communication for behavioral change in addition to reinforced organizational safeguard.

Key words: Dengue fever, Knowledge, Preventive behavior, Influencing factor, China-Myanmar border

中图分类号:

R373.3⁺3

刘慧, 许建卫, 夏敏, 杨明东, 李建雄, 尹一杰, 董新炜. 云南省西双版纳州和缅甸掸邦傣族居民登革热知识和预防行为及其影响因素分析[J]. 中国媒介生物学及控制杂志, 2020, 31(1): 57-61.

LIU Hui, XU Jian-wei, XIA Min, YANG Ming-dong, LI Jian-xiong, YIN Yi-jie, DONG Xin-wei. A comparative study of dengue fever-related knowledge level and preventive behaviors and their influencing factors in the Dai people between Xishuangbanna, Yunnan, China and Shan State Special Region 4, Myanmar[J]. Chines Journal of Vector Biology and Control, 2020, 31(1): 57-61.

参考文献

[1] WHO. Global strategy for dengue prevention and control 2012-2020[M]. Geneva:World Health Organization,2012:21-25.
[2] Lai SJ,Huang ZJ,Zhou H,et al. The changing epidemiology of dengue in China,1990-2014:a descriptive analysis of 25 years of nationwide surveillance data[J]. BMC Med,2015,13:100. DOI:10.1186/s12916-015-0336-1.
[3] 林钟宇,潘华峰,王正,等. 2014年广东登革热流行趋势与防控对策[J]. 卫生软科学,2015,29(9):590-592. Lin ZY,Pang HF,Wang Z,et al. Study of dengue fever epidemic trend and prevention and control countermeasure in 2014 in Guangdong[J]. Soft Sci Health,2015,29(9):590-592.
[4] 杨明东,姜进勇,郭晓芳,等. 2009-2014年云南省登革热流行病学调查与分析[J]. 中国病原生物学杂志,2015,10(8):738-742. DOI:10.13350/j.cjpb.150816. Yang MD,Jiang JY,Guo XF,et al. Epidemiological analysis and investigation of dengue fever in Yunnan province from 2009 to 2014[J]. J Path Biol,2015,10(8):738-742. DOI:10.13350/j.cjpb.150816.
[5] WHO. Dengue:guidelines for diagnosis,treatment,prevention and control[M]. Geneva:World Health Organization,2009:11-13.
[6] Kumaran E,Doum D,Keo V,et al. Dengue knowledge,attitudes and practices and their impact on community-based vector control in rural Cambodia[J]. PLoS Negl Trop Dis,2018,12(2):e0006268. DOI:10.1371/journal.pntd.0006268.
[7] Xu JW,Liu H,Ai D,et al. The Shan people's health beliefs,knowledge and perceptions of dengue in eastern Shan Special Region IV,Myanmar[J]. PLoS Negl Trop Dis,2019,13(6):e0007498. DOI:10.1371/journal.pntd.0007498.
[8] Xu JW,Liao YM,Liu H,et al. Use of bed nets and factors that influence bed net use among Jinuo Ethnic Minority in Southern China[J]. PLoS One,2014,9(7):e103780. DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0103780.
[9] Liu H,Xu JW,Guo XR,et al. Coverage,use and maintenance of bed nets and related influence factors in Kachin Special Region II,northeastern Myanmar[J]. Malar J,2015,14:212. DOI:10.1186/s12936-015-0727-y.
[10] Israel GD. Determining sample size[M]. Florida:University of Florida,1992:32-34.
[11] Xu JW,Xu QZ,Liu H,et al. Malaria treatment-seeking behaviour and related factors of Wa ethnic minority in Myanmar:a cross-sectional study[J]. Malar J,2012,11:417. DOI:10.1186/1475-2875-11-417.
[12] Xu JW,Liu H,Zhang Y,et al. Risk factors for border malaria in a malaria elimination setting:a retrospective case-control study in Yunnan,China[J]. Am J Trop Med Hyg,2015,92(3):546-551. DOI:10.4269/ajtmh.14-0321.
[13] 孟凤霞,王义冠,冯磊,等. 我国登革热疫情防控与媒介伊蚊的综合治理[J]. 中国媒介生物学及控制杂志,2015,26(1):4-10. DOI:10.11853/j.issn.1003.4692.2015.01.002. Meng FX,Wang YG,Feng L,et al. Review on dengue prevention and control and integrated mosquito management in China[J]. Chin J Vector Biol Control,2015,26(1):4-10. DOI:10.11853/j.issn.1003.4692.2015.01.002.
[14] Wong LP,AbuBakar S. Health beliefs and practices related to dengue fever:a focus group study[J]. PLoS Negl Trop Dis,2013,7(7):e2310. DOI:10.1371/journal.pntd.0002310.
[15] Chandren JR,Wong LP,AbuBakar S. Practices of dengue fever prevention and the associated factors among the Orang Asli in Peninsular Malaysia[J]. PLoS Negl Trop Dis,2015,9(8):e0003954. DOI:10.1371/journal.pntd.0003954.
[16] 姜进勇,杨明东,杨锐. 登革热疫情处置手册[M]. 昆明:云南科技出版社,2017:3-18. Jiang JY,Yang MD,Yang R. Manual of responding to dengue fever[M]. Kunming:Yunnan Science and Technology Press,2017:3-18.
[17] Xu JW,Li Y,Yang HL,et al. Malaria control along China-Myanmar Border during 2007-2013:an integrated impact evaluation[J]. Infect Dis Poverty,2016,5:75. DOI:10.1186/s40249-016-0171-4.

云南省西双版纳州和缅甸掸邦傣族居民登革热知识和预防行为及其影响因素分析

A comparative study of dengue fever-related knowledge level and preventive behaviors and their influencing factors in the Dai people between Xishuangbanna, Yunnan, China and Shan State Special Region 4, Myanmar

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	孙钦同, 韩英男, 刘言, 王学军, 刘峰, 赖世宏, 景晓. 山东省登革热媒介白纹伊蚊生态学调查分析[J]. 中国媒介生物学及控制杂志, 2022, 33(1): 16-20.
[2]	李天奇, 刘钦梅, 吴瑜燕, 罗明宇, 王金娜, 龚震宇. 浙江省登革热重点地区2020年白纹伊蚊幼蚊种群密度监测分析[J]. 中国媒介生物学及控制杂志, 2022, 33(1): 21-24.
[3]	魏超, 马海芳, 廖宁, 熊绮梦. 广西壮族自治区2020－2021年登革热媒介伊蚊密度专项调查结果分析[J]. 中国媒介生物学及控制杂志, 2022, 33(1): 25-29.
[4]	涂涛田, 肖汉森, 孟凤霞, 刘起勇, 刘小波, 何亚明, 季恒青. 重庆市2019年登革热暴发疫情应急控制后媒介伊蚊抗药性调查[J]. 中国媒介生物学及控制杂志, 2022, 33(1): 44-47.
[5]	伦辛畅, 杨锐, 吴海霞, 王君, 刘起勇, 孟凤霞. 2005－2019年云南省缅甸登革热输入病例流行特征分析[J]. 中国媒介生物学及控制杂志, 2022, 33(1): 108-113.
[6]	王彦丁, 李志强, 吴迪, 贡鑫然, 杨美涛, 张文义, 王勇. 基于中国知网的2011－2021年中国登革热研究进展与热点分析[J]. 中国媒介生物学及控制杂志, 2022, 33(1): 114-119.
[7]	薛海滨, 孟金霞, 任乐, 景晓. 山东省临沂市2018－2020年白纹伊蚊幼蚊监测与风险评估[J]. 中国媒介生物学及控制杂志, 2021, 32(6): 686-690.
[8]	罗兴, 刘艳春, 贾永朝. 四川省广元市2018－2020年登革热媒介伊蚊生态学特征分析[J]. 中国媒介生物学及控制杂志, 2021, 32(6): 705-709.
[9]	魏春, 郭小连, 杨锐, 唐烨榕, 岳玉娟, 刘小波, 刘起勇. 云南省2013－2020年登革热流行及聚集特征分析[J]. 中国媒介生物学及控制杂志, 2021, 32(6): 720-724.
[10]	唐娜, 董洋洋, 马建, 陈芝君, 戴罗桓, 阳益德, 贺权源, 周军华. 气象因素与登革热发病相关关系的Meta分析[J]. 中国媒介生物学及控制杂志, 2021, 32(6): 725-731.
[11]	武丽, 尹家祥. 蚤类与环境因素关系概述[J]. 中国媒介生物学及控制杂志, 2021, 32(6): 779-782.
[12]	张家林, 黄发源. 安徽省2015－2019年登革热媒介伊蚊监测结果分析[J]. 中国媒介生物学及控制杂志, 2021, 32(5): 582-585.
[13]	杨迎宇, 王莹莹, 陈芸, 付朝伟. 上海市宝山区登革热媒介伊蚊密度指数与气象因素滞后效应分析[J]. 中国媒介生物学及控制杂志, 2021, 32(3): 286-290.
[14]	伦辛畅, 赵春春, 朱彩英, 吴海霞, 王君, 王志会, 李文玉, 刘起勇, 孟凤霞. 2011－2019年柬埔寨登革热疫情及赴柬旅游对我国输入登革热的影响分析[J]. 中国媒介生物学及控制杂志, 2021, 32(3): 312-317.
[15]	徐名芳, 岳玉娟, 刘小波, 王君, 刘国军, 刘起勇, 张钦凤. 云南省瑞丽及景洪市2006－2018年登革热疫情特征比较研究[J]. 中国媒介生物学及控制杂志, 2021, 32(3): 318-323.