中国媒介生物学及控制杂志 ›› 2018, Vol. 29 ›› Issue (6): 576-581.DOI: 10.11853/j.issn.1003.8280.2018.06.006

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

热带臭虫及温带臭虫形态与分子鉴定

刘德星1, 邱德义1, 李婷婷1, 张瑞玲2, 刘春晓3, 岳巧云1,4   

  1. 1 中山出入境检验检疫局检验检疫技术中心, 广东 中山 528403;
    2 泰山医学院, 山东 泰安 271016;
    3 深圳国际旅行卫生保健中心, 广东 深圳 518000;
    4 中山大学生命科学学院, 广东 广州 510275
  • 收稿日期:2018-06-15 出版日期:2018-12-20 发布日期:2018-12-20
  • 通讯作者: 岳巧云,Email:yueqy@zs.gdciq.gov.cn
  • 作者简介:刘德星,男,助理工程师,从事病媒昆虫形态及DNA分子研究,Email:596217742@qq.com
  • 基金资助:
    国家重点研发计划(2016YFF0203205);国家质量监督检验检疫总局科技计划项目(2017IK165);广东检验检疫局科技计划项目(2017GDK63,2018GDK58)

Morphological and molecular identification of Cimex hemipterus and C. lectularius

LIU De-xing1, QIU De-yi1, LI Ting-ting1, ZHANG Rui-ling2, LIU Chun-xiao3, YUE Qiao-yun1,4   

  1. 1 Zhongshan Entry-Exit Inspection and Quarantine Bureau Technology Center, Zhongshan 528403, Guangdong Province, China;
    2 Taishan Medical University;
    3 Shenzhen International Travel Healthcare Center;
    4 College of Life Science Sun Yat-sen University
  • Received:2018-06-15 Online:2018-12-20 Published:2018-12-20
  • Supported by:
    Supported by the National Key Research and Development Program (No. 2016YFF0203205), National General Administration of Quality Supervision, Inspection and Quarantine Science and Technology Program (No. 2017IK165) and the Guangdong Entry-Exit Inspection and Quarantine Bureau (No. 2017GDK63, 2018GDK58)

摘要: 目的 建立近似种热带臭虫与温带臭虫形态学和分子鉴定的方法。方法 2017年7月在深圳市某大学集体宿舍和山东省泰安某大学集体宿舍分别发现并采集到热带臭虫和温带臭虫。比较热带臭虫与温带臭虫外部形态特征及线粒体基因细胞色素C氧化酶亚基Ⅰ(COI)基因、16S rDNA和核糖体基因28S rDNAITS2的序列,构建(Neighbor-Joining,NJ)进化树。结果 虽然热带臭虫与温带臭虫成虫的外部形态相似,但仍可以从前胸背板、翅基、足和腹部的细微特征区别进行鉴定,COI16S rDNA28S rDNAITS2 4个基因的DNA序列种内差异均<2%,种间差异均>2%,在构建的4个基因NJ进化树中,2个种均能各自聚为一支,且支持率均达100%。结论 热带臭虫和温带臭虫成虫可以利用外部形态鉴定,并能用常规的分子标记进行分子鉴定。形态和分子相结合的鉴定方法,为仅依赖形态特征难以区分的近似种的鉴定提供了一个高效的方法。

关键词: 热带臭虫, 温带臭虫, 形态与分子鉴定

Abstract: Objective To establish a method for the morphological and molecular identification of Cimex hemipterus and C. lectularius. Methods In July 2017, C. hemipterus were found and collected in a dormitory in a university in Shenzhen and C. lectularius were found and collected in a dormitory in a university in Tai'an, Shandong. The morphological characteristics of C. hemipterus and C. lectularius were compared and described. Neighbor-Joining (NJ) phylogenetic tree were constructed with mitochondrial gene COI, 16S rDNA, and ribosomal genes 28S rDNA, ITS2. Results Although the adults of C. hemipterus and C. lectularius were similar in external morphology, but they still can be identified and separated by the detailed characteristics differences on their prodorsum, elytra, leg and abdomen. The differences of intra-species DNA sequences based on four genes were less than 2%, and differences of inter-species DNA sequence based on four genes were more than 2%. In all the four NJ trees, C. hemipterus and C. lectularius were clustered into one single branch separately, and the support rate were 100%. Conclusion Cimex hemipterus and C. lectularius can be identified by their external morphology, and can be identified with the common adopted molecular marker. Molecular identification is a good tool to test the results of morphology. Combining the morphology and molecular identification together can provide a conclusive evidence for the morphological closely related species.

Key words: Cimex hemipterus, Cimex lectularius, Morphology and molecular identification

中图分类号: