3种植物浸液对白纹伊蚊产卵的影响研究

doi:10.11853/j.issn.1003.8280.2017.01.002

中国媒介生物学及控制杂志 ›› 2017, Vol. 28 ›› Issue (1): 4-8.DOI: 10.11853/j.issn.1003.8280.2017.01.002

3种植物浸液对白纹伊蚊产卵的影响研究

李凯利^1,2, 高景鹏², 曹洁¹, 马雅军²

1 第二军医大学基础医学实验教学中心, 上海 200433;
2 第二军医大学热带医学与公共卫生学系热带传染病学教研室, 上海 200433

收稿日期:2016-08-30 出版日期:2017-02-20 发布日期:2017-02-20
通讯作者: 马雅军,Email:yajun_ma@163.com
作者简介:李凯利,女,在读硕士,从事病原生物学研究,Email:kary_likaili@163.com
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金（81371848）

Oviposition responses of Aedes albopictus to three plant infusions

LI Kai-li^1,2, GAO Jing-peng², CAO Jie¹, MA Ya-jun²

1 The Experimental Training Center, Faculty of Basic Medical Sciences, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai 200433, China;
2 Department of Tropical Infectious Diseases, Faculty of Tropical Medicine and Public Health, Second Military Medical University

Received:2016-08-30 Online:2017-02-20 Published:2017-02-20
Supported by:
Supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China（No. 81371848）

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

目的筛选具有诱集白纹伊蚊产卵活性的植物浸液，并分析其化学成分。方法选择稻草、竹叶和狗牙根浸泡不同时间，在实验室和现场进行白纹伊蚊诱集产卵实验，利用气相色谱-质谱联用仪（GC-MS）分析植物浸液中的挥发性化合物。结果实验室稻草和竹叶浸液均有诱集白纹伊蚊产卵的活性，狗牙根浸液的诱集活性较差。稻草及竹叶浸液的平均诱卵率分别为63.20%~80.20%和47.51%~86.34%，平均产卵活跃指数（OAI）分别为0.26~0.60和-0.05~0.76；稻草浸泡30~70 d，竹叶浸泡50~70 d具有明显的诱集活性，浸泡时间越长，诱集效果越好。应用浸泡≥50 d的浸液进行现场实验，稻草及竹叶浸液的平均诱卵率分别为70.99%~96.17%和69.52%~89.51%；平均OAI分别为0.42~0.93和0.39~0.79。GC-MS鉴定不同浸泡时间稻草浸液中的化合物共108种，竹叶浸液有97种，其中相对含量>3%的化学物共17种，2，4-二苯酚（C₁₄H₂₂O）和苯甲醛（C₉H₁₇O）在所有样本中均存在，且含量较高。结论稻草和竹叶浸泡一定时间后，其浸液具有明显的诱集白纹伊蚊产卵活性，主要化学成分为2，4-二苯酚和苯甲醛。

关键词: 稻草浸液, 竹叶浸液, 产卵, 白纹伊蚊, 气相色谱-质谱联用仪

Abstract:

Objective To evaluate the effect of different plant infusions on the oviposition behavior of female Aedes albopictus and analyze the chemical composition. Methods The plant infusions were made by soaking leaves of Oryza sativa, Bambusaceae and Cynodon dactylon in sterile water for different times. The oviposition preference of gravid Ae. albopictus to plant infusions was tested in laboratory and field. Gas chromatography-mass spectrometer(GC-MS) was used to detect the chemical compounds of the plant infusions. Results It was different oviposition response of Ae. albopictus laboratory colony to O. sativa, Bambusaceae and C. dactylon infusions. The average spawning rate and oviposition activity index(OAI) were 63.20%-80.20% and 0.26-0.60 in O. sativa infusion; 47.51%-86.34% and -0.05-0.76 in Bambusaceae infusion, respectively. There was no oviposition preference in C. dactylon infusions. The effect of oviposition preference was significant from 30 d(O. sativa) and 50 d(Bambusaceae)to 70 d of soaking time. The trend was that the longer soaking time, the better of attractancy effects. The infusions of O. sativa and Bambusaceae after 50 d soaking time were used to test in field. The average spawning rate and its OAI were 70.99%-96.17% and 69.52%-89.51%, 0.42-0.93 and 0.39-0.79 in O. sativa infusions and Bambusaceae infusions. The GC-MS results showed that O. sativa infusion contained 108 chemical compounds and Bambusaceae infusions with 97 compounds. Of them, there were 17 compounds whose relative percentage more than 3%. The 2, 4-bis(1, 1-dimethylethyl)-phenol and Benzaldehyde were included in all samples and had higher relative content. Conclusion The infusions of O. sativa and Bambusaceae leaf had significant effect on oviposition attractancy after soaking for certain period time,and the major chemical compounds were 2, 4-bis(1, 1-dimethylethyl)-phenol and Benzaldehyde.

Key words: Oryza sativa infusions, Bambusaceae infusions, Oviposition, Aedes albopictus, Gas chromatography-mass spectrometer

中图分类号:

李凯利, 高景鹏, 曹洁, 马雅军. 3种植物浸液对白纹伊蚊产卵的影响研究[J]. 中国媒介生物学及控制杂志, 2017, 28(1): 4-8.

LI Kai-li, GAO Jing-peng, CAO Jie, MA Ya-jun. Oviposition responses of Aedes albopictus to three plant infusions[J]. Chines Journal of Vector Biology and Control, 2017, 28(1): 4-8.

参考文献

[1] 陆宝麟. 中国动物志. 昆虫纲. 第8卷. 双翅目:蚊科(上)[M]. 北京:科学出版社, 1997:243-245.
[2] Bonizzoni M, Gasperi G,Chen XG,et al. The invasive mosquito species Aedes albopictus:current knowledge and future perspectives[J]. Trends Parasitol, 2013, 29(9):460-468.
[3] Enserink M. Entomology:a mosquito goes global[J]. Science, 2008, 320(5878):864-866.
[4] Miller MJ,Loaiza JR. Geographic expansion of the invasive mosquito Aedes albopictus across Panama-implications for control of dengue and Chikungunya viruses[J]. PLoS Negl Trop Dis, 2015, 9(1):e0003383.
[5] 孟凤霞,王义冠,冯磊,等. 我国登革热疫情防控与媒介伊蚊的综合治理[J]. 中国媒介生物学及控制杂志, 2015, 26(1):4-10.
[6] 李凯利,马雅军,曹洁. 蚊虫产卵影响因子的研究新进展[J]. 中国病原生物学杂志, 2016, 11(7):675-678.
[7] 乔树海,宋传德,赵树公. 白纹伊蚊产卵习性初步观察[J]. 医学动物防制, 1991, 7(2):91-92.
[8] Yu KX, Wong CL, Ahmad R, et al. Mosquitocidal and oviposition repellent activities of the extracts of seaweed Bryopsis pennata on Aedes aegypti and Aedes albopictus[J]. Molecules, 2015, 20(8):14082-14102.
[9] Sharma KR,Seenivasagan T,Rao AN,et al. Oviposition responses of Aedes aegypti and Aedes albopictus to certain fatty acid esters[J]. Parasitol Res, 2008, 103(5):1065-1073.
[10] 郝蕙玲. 蚊虫引诱因子及其在诱杀技术中的应用[J]. 中华卫生杀虫药械, 2014, 20(4):297-302, 305.
[11] 邓天福,莫建初,程家安. 白纹伊蚊产卵引诱物研究[J]. 浙江大学学报:农业与生命科学版, 2009, 35(5):532-536.
[12] 邓天福,莫建初. 糖和维生素对淡色库蚊及白纹伊蚊产卵选择的影响[J]. 中国媒介生物学及控制杂志, 2011, 22(2):114-116.
[13] 邓天福,刘吉起,莫建初. 蛋白质和氨基酸对2种蚊虫产卵选择的影响[J]. 中国媒介生物学及控制杂志, 2012, 23(1):51-53.
[14] 张令要,张险峰,岳木生,等. 不同植物浸液对白纹伊蚊的产卵引诱作用[J]. 昆虫知识, 2008, 45(2):251-255.
[15] 张令要,雷朝亮. 嗅觉和视觉引诱物对白纹伊蚊产卵行为的影响[J]. 寄生虫与医学昆虫学报, 2012, 19(1):25-28.
[16] 李志强,钟俊鸿,肖维良,等. 登革热媒介白纹伊蚊产卵的习惯化行为及可持续控制[J]. 广东农业科学, 2010(9):186-188.
[17] 任旭琦,刘彬,向文龙,等. 酵母来源的CO2在不同环境下的诱蚊效果[J]. 热带医学杂志, 2009, 9(6):637-639, 617.
[18] 于德宪,周文,任旭琦,等. 诱蚊诱卵器与诱引剂结合对白纹伊蚊的诱引作用[J]. 中国媒介生物学及控制杂志, 2009, 20(6):507-510.
[19] Kramer WL,Mulla MS. Oviposition attractants and repellents of mosquitoes:oviposition responses of Culex mosquitoes to organic infusions[J]. Environ Entomol, 1979, 8(6):1111-1117.
[20] Obenauer PJ, Allan SA, Kaufman PE. Aedes albopictus(Diptera:Culicidae) oviposition response to organic infusions from common flora of suburban Florida[J]. J Vector Ecol, 2010, 35(2):301-306.
[21] Torres-Estrada JL,Meza-Alvarez RA,Cruz-López L,et al. Attraction of gravid Anopheles pseudopunctipennis females to oviposition substrates by Spirogyra majuscula (Zygnematales:Zygnmataceae) algae under laboratory conditions[J]. J Am Mosq Control Assoc, 2007, 23(1):18-23.
[22] Ponnusamy L,Xu N,Böröczky K,et al. Oviposition responses of the mosquitoes Aedes aegypti and Aedes albopictus to experimental plant infusions in laboratory bioassays[J]. J Chem Ecol, 2010, 36(7):709-719.
[23] Ray A. Reception of odors and repellents in mosquitoes[J]. Curr Opin Neurobiol, 2015, 34:158-164.
[24] Mbare O,Lindsay SW,Fillinger U. Pyriproxyfen for mosquito control:female sterilization or horizontal transfer to oviposition substrates by Anopheles gambiae sensu stricto and Culex quinquefasciatus[J]. Parasit Vectors, 2014, 7(1):280.
[25] Seenivasagan T,Sharma KR,Prakash S. Electroantennogram, flight orientation and oviposition responses of Anopheles stephensi and Aedes aegypti to a fatty acid ester-propyl octadecanoate[J]. Acta Trop, 2012, 124(1):54-61.
[26] Kuppusamy C,Murugan K. Skin and oviposition deterrent, ovicidal and deleterious delayed mortality effects of α-amyrin acetate against the malarial vector Anopheles stephensi(Diptera:Culicidae)[J]. J Entomol Res Soc, 2012, 14(3):39-53.
[27] Warburg A,Faiman R,Shtern A,et al. Oviposition habitat selection by Anopheles gambiae in response to chemical cues by Notonecta maculata[J]. J Vector Ecol, 2011, 36(2):421-425.
[28] 邵明辉,王雪青,赵文越,等. 板栗花精油的化学组成及对白纹伊蚊驱避作用研究[J]. 中国媒介生物学及控制杂志, 2015, 26(1):62-65.

3种植物浸液对白纹伊蚊产卵的影响研究

Oviposition responses of Aedes albopictus to three plant infusions

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	孙钦同, 韩英男, 刘言, 王学军, 刘峰, 赖世宏, 景晓. 山东省登革热媒介白纹伊蚊生态学调查分析[J]. 中国媒介生物学及控制杂志, 2022, 33(1): 16-20.
[2]	李天奇, 刘钦梅, 吴瑜燕, 罗明宇, 王金娜, 龚震宇. 浙江省登革热重点地区2020年白纹伊蚊幼蚊种群密度监测分析[J]. 中国媒介生物学及控制杂志, 2022, 33(1): 21-24.
[3]	魏超, 马海芳, 廖宁, 熊绮梦. 广西壮族自治区2020－2021年登革热媒介伊蚊密度专项调查结果分析[J]. 中国媒介生物学及控制杂志, 2022, 33(1): 25-29.
[4]	赵春春, 周欣欣, 李文玉, 伦辛畅, 刘小波, 吴海霞, 王君, 刘起勇, 孟凤霞. 2020年中国13省份登革热媒介白纹伊蚊抗药性监测及分析研究[J]. 中国媒介生物学及控制杂志, 2022, 33(1): 30-37.
[5]	郑宇婷, 杨春梅, 杨明东, 姜进勇. 云南边境地区登革热媒介伊蚊生态学及抗药性监测[J]. 中国媒介生物学及控制杂志, 2022, 33(1): 38-43.
[6]	涂涛田, 肖汉森, 孟凤霞, 刘起勇, 刘小波, 何亚明, 季恒青. 重庆市2019年登革热暴发疫情应急控制后媒介伊蚊抗药性调查[J]. 中国媒介生物学及控制杂志, 2022, 33(1): 44-47.
[7]	周欣欣, 李芬, 段文波, 马欣然, 宋秀平, 吴少英, 孟凤霞. 白纹伊蚊电压门控钠离子通道基因克隆及其生物信息学分析[J]. 中国媒介生物学及控制杂志, 2021, 32(6): 672-679.
[8]	薛海滨, 孟金霞, 任乐, 景晓. 山东省临沂市2018－2020年白纹伊蚊幼蚊监测与风险评估[J]. 中国媒介生物学及控制杂志, 2021, 32(6): 686-690.
[9]	张育富, 张守刚, 朱丁, 顾灯安, 葛小伍, 袁建明, 崔倩, 褚宏亮. 江苏省多层住宅居民区不同楼层白纹伊蚊分布调查[J]. 中国媒介生物学及控制杂志, 2021, 32(6): 700-704.
[10]	周毅彬, 朱奕奕, 朱伟, 姚隽一, 朱江, 冷培恩, 吴寰宇. 诱蚊诱卵器监测的空间抽样方法研究[J]. 中国媒介生物学及控制杂志, 2021, 32(6): 749-755.
[11]	朱伟, 刘翔宇, 周毅彬. 绿篱喷洒控制白纹伊蚊密度的时空变化研究[J]. 中国媒介生物学及控制杂志, 2021, 32(6): 772-778.
[12]	郭秀霞, 程鹏, 刘丽娟, 王海防, 张崇星, 王怀位, 公茂庆. 白纹伊蚊紫外光敏感视蛋白基因的克隆及序列特征[J]. 中国媒介生物学及控制杂志, 2021, 32(5): 553-559.
[13]	张家林, 黄发源. 安徽省2015－2019年登革热媒介伊蚊监测结果分析[J]. 中国媒介生物学及控制杂志, 2021, 32(5): 582-585.
[14]	邓惠, 刘礼平, 许齐爱, 廉战民, 段金花, 陈宗晶, 芦瑞鹏, 沈秀婷, 阴伟雄, 吴军, 林立丰. 3种蚊虫引诱剂与不同流量CO₂对白纹伊蚊诱集效果的研究[J]. 中国媒介生物学及控制杂志, 2021, 32(5): 637-641.
[15]	陈秋梅, 王热勤, 吴海霞, 张涛, 马燕东, 颉东岗, 管斌. 甘肃省天水市2017－2020年两种重要媒介蚊虫监测结果分析[J]. 中国媒介生物学及控制杂志, 2021, 32(4): 456-460.