南宁市某住宅区杀它仗蜡块灭鼠现场效果观察

中国媒介生物学及控制杂志 ›› 2012, Vol. 23 ›› Issue (2): 171-173.

南宁市某住宅区杀它仗蜡块灭鼠现场效果观察

黄超¹, 李华², 冯向阳³, 周冬梅⁴

1. 南宁市疾病预防控制中心质量管理科, 广西南宁530011;
2. 南宁市爱卫会办公室;
3. 广西壮族自治区疾病预防控制中心;
4. 北京特灵生物技术公司南宁分公司

收稿日期:2011-10-25 出版日期:2012-04-20 发布日期:2012-04-20
作者简介:黄超(1958-),女,壮族,副主任医师,从事病媒生物防制研究。Email: h_chao711@foxmail.com

Field investigation on the efficacy of stratagem block for rat control in a residential area in Nanning

HUANG Chao¹, LI Hua², FENG Xiang-yang³, ZHOU Dong-mei⁴

1. Nanning Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Nanning 530011, Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, China;
2. Nanning Patriotic Health Campaign Committee;
3. Guangxi Center for Disease Control and Prevention;
4. Nanning Branch, Beijing Biotechnolongy Company Trene

Received:2011-10-25 Online:2012-04-20 Published:2012-04-20

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

目的了解杀它仗蜡块在亚热带地区住宅区的灭鼠效果。方法选择某住宅区作为本次试验现场,以新鲜稻谷为诱饵,用盗食法了解鼠密度;采用间歇投药法和饱和投药法投放灭鼠毒饵。结果间歇投药法第1个周期后鼠密度下降率为69.0%,第2个周期为61.8%,第3个周期为45.3%;饱和投药法10 d后鼠密度下降率达81.0%。结论杀它仗蜡块在高温、高湿环境下,性状稳定,对鼠的选择性较强,无非靶标动物中毒,饱和投药法的鼠密度下降率优于间隙投药法。

关键词: 杀它仗蜡块, 住宅区, 灭鼠效果

Abstract:

Objective To investigate the efficacy of Stratagem block for rat control in a residential area in the semi-tropical area. Methods One residential area in the semi-tropical area was chosen for the field test. Fresh rice was used as bait and the rodent density was worked out by bait-stealing method. Baits were laid by means of pulse and surplus-baiting techniques. Results It was found that with the pulse-baiting technique the rat density reduced by 69.0%, 61.8% and 45.3% in the first, second and third period, respectively. In contrast, the reduction rate of rat density amounted to 81.0% with the surplus-baiting method. Conclusion Stratagem is safe and stable in a condition of high temperature and humidity, and highly selective for rats with no collateral damage to non-targeted animals during the experiment. The surplus-baiting technique is superior to the pulse-baiting method in terms of their efficacy for reducing rat density.

Key words: Stratagem, Residential area, Rodent control efficacy

中图分类号:

黄超, 李华, 冯向阳, 周冬梅. 南宁市某住宅区杀它仗蜡块灭鼠现场效果观察[J]. 中国媒介生物学及控制杂志, 2012, 23(2): 171-173.

HUANG Chao, LI Hua, FENG Xiang-yang, ZHOU Dong-mei. Field investigation on the efficacy of stratagem block for rat control in a residential area in Nanning[J]. Chines Journal of Vector Biology and Control, 2012, 23(2): 171-173.

[1]	刘正祥, 高子厚, 段兴德, 梁云, 张正飞, 段炳华, 浦恩念, 苏超, 李玉琼. 云南省野鼠鼠疫疫区处置中溴敌隆灭鼠效果评价[J]. 中国媒介生物学及控制杂志, 2018, 29(2): 172-174.
[2]	殷为申, 蔡恩茂, 冷培恩, 郑翚, 何晓岚. 新型环保杀鼠剂胆钙化醇现场灭鼠效果观察[J]. 中国媒介生物学及控制杂志, 2018, 29(2): 200-201.
[3]	康立, 蔡婷, 彭建生, 张伟, 李国珍, 韩思齐, 田占峰. 新型灭鼠盒灭鼠效果观察[J]. 中国媒介生物学及控制杂志, 2017, 28(3): 296-297.
[4]	查木哈, 付和平, 武晓东, 张福顺, 袁帅, 那日苏. 不同饵料和投饵方法防治大沙鼠的比较研究[J]. 中国媒介生物学及控制杂志, 2012, 23(1): 18-21.
[5]	尹小平, 叶志辉, 彭定希, 骄娃, 刘文平, 阿布都·扎伊尔. 阿拉山口口岸灭鼠效果回顾性分析及鼠情反弹监控的探讨[J]. 中国媒介生物学及控制杂志, 2011, 22(3): 269-272.
[6]	龚晓俊，刘昭兵，陈贵春，王月，黄艳萍，王仕香. 2008年龙滩水电站贵州库区移民安置点灭鼠效果评价[J]. 中国媒介生物学及控制杂志, 2010, 21(2): 146-147.
[7]	王君，任东升，刘起勇. α-氯代醇饵剂实验室及现场鼠害控制效果观察[J]. 中国媒介生物学及控制杂志, 2010, 21(2): 157-158.
[8]	李俊1，施大钊1，郭永旺2，吴新平3，嵇莉莉3，宝祥4. 2种杀鼠剂不同投饵方式防治长爪沙鼠的灭效比较[J]. 中国媒介生物学及控制杂志, 2009, 20(4): 293-294,348.
[9]	孙亮;范锁平;佘建军; 阮春来; 安翠红; 岳永杰. 3种抗凝血灭鼠剂实验室及现场灭鼠效果比较[J]. 中国媒介生物学及控制杂志, 2008, 19(5): 411-412.
[10]	张世水;霍新北;宫学诗;景晓;王学军. 杀鼠迷小麦毒饵实验室、不同现场灭鼠效果及对非靶动物的毒性实验观察[J]. 中国媒介生物学及控制杂志, 2007, 18(5): 363-365.
[11]	刘大鹏1;顾键2;谢龄庆3;孙俊1. 新型灭鼠剂实验室灭鼠效果观察[J]. 中国媒介生物学及控制杂志, 2004, 15(4): 296-298.
[12]	李晨华. 大同市C型肉毒毒素草地灭鼠效果观察[J]. 中国媒介生物学及控制杂志, 2003, 14(3): 188-189.
[13]	刘大鹏1;顾键2;章进宝2;陈怀友2;谢龄庆3;孙俊1. 新型灭鼠药实验室灭鼠效果的初步观察[J]. 中国媒介生物学及控制杂志, 2003, 14(2): 92-93.
[14]	徐仁权1;丁成伟2;孙红专3;费胜军4;王士珍1;徐劲秋1. 提高肾综合征出血热地区灭鼠效果的措施研究[J]. 中国媒介生物学及控制杂志, 2002, 13(5): 333-335.
[15]	罗维沛1;江钢锋2;陈钦撰2;洪延海1. 毒饵盒法作为巩固灭鼠方法的探讨[J]. 中国媒介生物学及控制杂志, 2002, 13(3): 174-175.