中国媒介生物学及控制杂志 ›› 2011, Vol. 22 ›› Issue (6): 550-552.

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

黑箱法与灯诱法蚊虫监测结果比较

冷培恩1, 徐友祥2, 武峥嵘2, 刘洪霞1, 徐仁权1   

  1. 1. 上海市疾病预防控制中心病媒生物防治科,上海 200336;
    2. 嘉定区疾病预防控制中心
  • 收稿日期:2011-06-24 出版日期:2011-12-20 发布日期:2011-12-20
  • 作者简介:冷培恩(1963-),男,主任医师,主要从事媒介生物学研究。Email: peleng@scdc.sh.cn
  • 基金资助:

    国家科技重大专项课题(2008ZX10004-010)

Comparison of surveillance efficacy between black box and lamp trap methods

LENG Pei-en1, XU You-xiang2, WU Zheng-rong2, LIU Hong-xia1, XU Ren-quan1   

  1. 1. Shanghai Municipal Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Shanghai 200336, China;
    2. Jiading District Center for Disease Control and Prevention
  • Received:2011-06-24 Online:2011-12-20 Published:2011-12-20
  • Supported by:

    Supported by the Major National Science and Technology Projects of China(No. 2008ZX10004-010)

摘要:

目的 比较黑箱法与灯诱法监测蚊虫密度的差异,探讨黑箱法在蚊虫监测中的作用。方法 在7个实验点,每个点放诱蚊灯2只,在相距诱蚊灯10 m处放置黑箱1只,每月监测2次。结果 灯诱法监测捕获蚊虫总数和雌蚊数量是黑箱法的3.50和3.75倍,蚊虫数量的季节消长均呈单峰型,7月达高峰,2种方法监测逐月蚊虫数量高度相关。黑箱法监测淡色库蚊占84.64%,三带喙库蚊占10.02%,中华按蚊占3.34%;灯诱法监测淡色库蚊占80.47%,三带喙库蚊占11.79%,中华按蚊占6.88%;2种监测方法均捕获少量的白纹伊蚊和骚扰阿蚊;黑箱法和灯诱法监测蚊虫雌雄比例基本一致;不同监测环境黑箱法和灯诱法捕获蚊虫数量存在较大差异,在公园和医院黑箱法占较大优势,在牧场和农户灯诱法的优势较大。黑箱法昼夜捕蚊数量在05:00和19:00各有一个高峰,不同环境昼夜捕蚊数量亦有差异,医院无明显捕获高峰;公园、农户、牧场均有早晚2个高峰,晚高峰的时间略有差异;居民区捕蚊仅出现晚高峰。结论 黑箱法可替代灯诱法开展蚊虫密度监测,且具有设备简单、操作方便、无需供电等优势;建议采用黑箱法监测蚊虫密度时可选择在晚高峰前放置黑箱,在早高峰后收回。

关键词: 黑箱法, 灯诱法, 蚊虫, 监测

Abstract:

Objective To evaluate the application of black box method in mosquito surveillance by comparing the results from black box and lamp trap methods. Methods Two lamps were set at each surveillance site and one black box was put at a 10 m interval from each lamp. Surveillance was conducted twice every month. Results The total number of captured mosquitoes and the number of female mosquitoes by the lamp trap method was 3.50 times and 3.75 times higer than those monitored by black box method, respectively. The seasonal fluctuation curves reflected by both Methods were unimodal, with a peak in July. The monthly calculations of mosquitoes of the two Methods were highly correlated. Mosquitoes captured by the black box method included Culex pipens pallens (84.64%), Cx. tritaeriorhynchus (10.02%), and Anopheles sinensis (3.34%), and those by the lamp trap method were Cx. pipens pallens (80.47%), Cx. tritaeriorhynchus (11.79%), and An. sinensis (6.88%). Only a few Aedes albopictus and Armigeres subalbatus were trapped. The male-female ratios were similar between the two methods, whereas great difference in the mosquito number was found in distinct environments. Black box method was more effective in parks and hospitals than the other, while lamp trap was more effective in pasture lands and farms. Two peaks of mosquito density were shown on 05: 00 and 19: 00 with environmental difference between day and night. The day and night peaks of density were also present in parks, farms and pasture lands except hospitals and residential areas where only one night peak was shown. Conclusion With fewer requirements for equipment, operation skills and power supply, the black box method is an effective alternative to the lamp trap approach. Deployment before the night peak of density and collection after the early morning peak is recommended for mosquito monitoring.

Key words: Black box method, Lamp trap method, Mosquito, Monitoring

中图分类号: