中国媒介生物学及控制杂志

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

蚊香药效测试方法的比较研究

汤永康;任樟尧   

  1. 浙江省疾病预防控制中心 杭州310009
  • 出版日期:2002-12-20 发布日期:2002-12-20

A Study of the Test Methodson Mosqui to Incense Effect

TANG Yong-kang; REN Zhang-yao   

  1. Zhejiang Provincial Center for Disease Prevention andControl(CDPC),Hangzhou 310009,China
  • Online:2002-12-20 Published:2002-12-20

摘要: 目的:通过对3种蚊香采用模拟实验和室内生物药效KT50和24h死亡率测定,比较两种方法对结果的影响程度和正确评价蚊香类产品的有效途径。方法:采用GB13917和GBT17322规定的测试方法和评价标准进行,试虫为本实验室饲养的淡色库蚊敏感品系,测试样品来源于监督机构采样、市场抽样和企业自送检样品。结果:KT50和24h死亡率,均以盘式蚊香为最高(75.00%),在盘式蚊香中添加巴沙能提高KT50和24h死亡率。模拟实验测试法对盘式蚊香比较敏感(χ2=18.66,P<0.05);但电热片蚊香与电热液体蚊香差异无显著性(x2=0.32,P>0.05)。结论:生物药效测试是评价蚊香类产品的有效方法,在盘式蚊香测试中,模拟现场对靶生物要比室内药效测试方法敏感,但电热片蚊香与电热液体蚊香则不然,认为两种测试方法具有互补性,对蚊香类产品的测试采用两种方法同时进行,可纠正或减少实验误差。

关键词: 蚊香, 药效, 测试方法

Abstract: Objective:Comparing the influences of test methods on their results of KT50 and 24 h death rate of mosquito in order to explore the proper way to evaluate mosquito incense products.Methods:Simulating field test and the standard test for indoor insecticidal efficacy were adopted according to the test methods and evaluating standards of GB13917and GB/T17322.Results:Amoung mosquito-repellent products,incense coils had better insecticidal efficacy in simulating field test than in the indoor insecticidal efficacy test(χ2=18.66,P<0.05) while electric mosquito-repellent mat and electric mosquito-repellent liquid had no significant differences(χ2=0.32,P>0.05).Conclusion:Amoung mosquito-repellent products,incense coils had better insecticdal efficacy in simulating field test than in the indoor insecticidal efficacy test while electric mosquito-repellent mat and liquid had no significant differences.The two methods complemented mutually.Adoption of them meantime in tests of mosquito-repellent products can correct or reduce experimental error.