中国媒介生物学及控制杂志

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

霹杀高与奋斗呐悬浮剂对家蝇滞留效果比较

曾晓芃; 马彦; 薛素琴; 韩玉华   

  1. 北京市卫生防疫站100013
  • 出版日期:2000-04-20 发布日期:2000-04-20

Comparative Efficacy on Pesguard SC 5 and Fendona SC 1.5 Against Housefly in Laboratory

Zeng XiaoPeng; Ma Yan; Xue Suqin; et al   

  1. Beijing Health and Anti-Epidemic Station, Beijing 100013
  • Online:2000-04-20 Published:2000-04-20

摘要: 目的:比较霹杀高5%悬浮剂和奋斗呐1.5%悬浮剂对家蝇的持效。方法:强迫接触法。结果:霹杀高和奋斗呐对家蝇在清漆三合板上的持效可达90d,但奋斗呐的速杀作用要好于霹杀高。结论:这两种制剂对家蝇均具有良好的持效作用。

关键词: 霹杀高5%悬浮剂, 奋斗呐1.5%悬浮剂, 家蝇, 持效

Abstract: This paper reported the comparative efficacy on Pesguard SC 5 and Fendona SC 1.5 against housefly on three-plywood surface. The experimental results showed that the lasting effect of Pesguard and Fendona was 3 months for housefly and the quick efficacy of Fendona was better than that of Pesguard.