中国媒介生物学及控制杂志

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

餐饮业防灭蝇设施的效果研究

冷培恩1; 刘建国2; 陆美英3; 陆中力4; 王永鸣2; 叶苗凉3; 郁惠德4   

  1. 1上海市疾病预防控制中心 上海200031; 2徐汇区卫生防疫站; 3杨浦区卫生防疫站; 4松江区卫生防疫站
  • 出版日期:1999-08-20 发布日期:1999-08-20

Operational Testing of Electric Traps and Fan Screen Door and Bead Screen Door for Fly Control and Anti-entrance in Dining Facilities

Leng Peien; Liu Jianguo; Lu Meiying; et al   

  1. Shanghai Municipal Center for Disease Control and Prevention
  • Online:1999-08-20 Published:1999-08-20

摘要: 目的:了解餐饮行业现有防灭蝇设施的效果。方法:选择设置有灭蝇灯、风帘门、珠帘门的快餐店和饭店进行试验,用目测、拍打和粘捕法观察上述设施的使用与否对餐饮业室内蝇密度的影响。结果:灭蝇灯、风帘门、珠帘门使用时室内苍蝇均明显少于不使用时,且差异有显著性,但室内仍有不少苍蝇。结论:餐饮行业除了防蝇设施外,还需辅以其它灭蝇方法及措施。

关键词: 苍蝇, 灭蝇灯, 风帘门, 珠帘门

Abstract: Operational testing of electric traps and fan screen door and bead screen door was conducted in some dining halls in Shanghai. The traps in each facility were turned on during 1 wk, and then off during the next, for an 8-wk period, and the fan screen doors in each facility were turned on during 2 d, and then off during the next, for an 16-d period, and the bead screen doors in each facility were used during 1 d, and then unused during the next, for an 8-d period. Insect activity was monitored by counting number of specimens collected on flypaper, active insects were observed and patted with fly-pat in the room. More flies were caught on flypaper, collected by patted with fly-pat, and counted by eyesight during each time when traps and fan screen doors were turn on , and when bead screen doors were unused .The difference of data which were analyzed using χ2 contingency tables was significant. However, as shown by this study, electric traps and fan screen doors and bead screen doors show promise as pest-management devices in dining facilities, but other methods for flies control are necessary.