新型驱避配方的筛选及对白纹伊蚊室内驱避效果研究

doi:10.11853/j.issn.1003.8280.2024.04.005

中国媒介生物学及控制杂志 ›› 2024, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (4): 411-416.DOI: 10.11853/j.issn.1003.8280.2024.04.005

新型驱避配方的筛选及对白纹伊蚊室内驱避效果研究

刘曜¹, 刘锐¹, 张杰², 姚隽一¹, 张宸罡¹, 李鑫³, 吴寰宇¹, 刘洪霞¹

1. 上海市疾病预防控制中心传染病防治所病媒生物防治科, 上海 200336;
2. 上海市杨浦区疾病预防控制中心, 上海 200090;
3. 巴斯夫(中国)有限公司, 上海 200003

收稿日期:2024-02-21 出版日期:2024-08-20 发布日期:2024-08-27
通讯作者: 刘洪霞,E-mail:liuhongxia@scdc.sh.cn;吴寰宇,E-mail:wuhuanyu@scdc.sh.cn
作者简介:刘曜,女,副主任技师,主要从事病媒生物研究工作,E-mail:liuyao@scdc.sh.cn;刘锐,男,硕士,主管医师,主要从事病媒生物研究工作,E-mail:liurui@scdc.sh.cn
基金资助:
上海市加强公共卫生体系建设三年行动计划(2023-2025年)重点学科(GWⅥ-11.1-13)

Screening for a new mosquito repellent formula and its repellent effect against Aedes albopictus in laboratory

LIU Yao¹, LIU Rui¹, ZHANG Jie², YAO Jun-yi¹, ZHANG Chen-gang¹, LI Xin³, WU Huan-yu¹, LIU Hong-xia¹

1. Department of Vector Control and Prevention, Division of Infectious Diseases Control and Prevention, Shanghai Municipal Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Shanghai 200336, China;
2. Shanghai Yangpu District Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Shanghai 200090, China;
3. BASF (China) Co., Ltd, Shanghai 200003, China

Received:2024-02-21 Online:2024-08-20 Published:2024-08-27
Supported by:
The Sixth Round of Three-Year (2023-2025) Public Health Action Plan of Shanghai (No. GWⅥ-11.1-13)

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的探索新型驱避成分不同浓度的实验室驱避药效,比较加入助剂的配方制剂与其他常用驱避剂成分对白纹伊蚊的室内驱避效果,为新型驱避剂的研发提供实验基础。方法采用《农药登记用卫生杀虫剂室内药效试验及评价第9部分：驱避剂》（GB/T 13917.9—2009）试验方法。利用Excel 2007软件进行数据录入,使用SPSS 22.0软件进行统计学分析。采用重复测量多因素方差分析检验不同浓度新型驱避剂和乙醇对蚊虫的驱避时间是否存在差异；采用配对样本t检验对比乙醇配制的制剂与新型驱避剂的配方制剂间驱避时间差异；采用随机区组设计方差分析检验配方制剂与常用驱避剂对蚊虫的驱避时间差异。结果新型驱避成分对白纹伊蚊的驱避效果随浓度的升高而增强。新型驱避剂的浓度达到10%时驱避时间可达到4 h以上,浓度为20%时驱避时间可以达到6 h以上。5%浓度制剂[平均驱避时间为（2.62±0.83）h]的驱避效果低于12%、15%和20%等3组驱避剂浓度[平均驱避时间分别为（5.13±1.05）、（4.94±0.98）和（6.08±1.76）h,均P<0.05],其余各浓度驱避剂的驱避时间差异无统计学意义[10%浓度制剂的平均驱避时间为（4.91±1.17）h,均P>0.05]。15%乙醇制剂[平均驱避时间为（4.16±1.56）h]的驱避效果低于50%乙醇制剂[平均驱避时间为（5.22±1.53）h]的驱避效果（P<0.05）,其余各浓度乙醇制剂的驱避时间差异无统计学意义[35%和75%乙醇制剂的平均驱避时间分别为（4.69±1.59）和（4.89±1.77）h,均P>0.05]。新型驱避成分与乙醇的交互效应不显著（F=0.849,P=0.601）。使用助剂能延长驱避时间,新型驱避剂配方制剂的驱避时间比12%终浓度的15%、35%、50%和75%乙醇制剂分别增长了55.25%、16.73%、11.89%和9.91%。配方制剂[驱避时间为（6.21±0.97）h]与常用驱避剂对比,驱避效果优于4.5%驱蚊酯[驱避时间为（2.89±0.83）h]和7%避蚊胺[驱避时间为（3.54±0.96）h],低于10%羟哌酯[驱避时间为（7.65±0.28）h],介于植物精油（含孟二醇）和15%避蚊胺之间[驱避时间分别为（5.45±0.75）和（6.94±1.41）h]。结论新型驱避成分的驱避剂活性得到实验室验证,有较好的应用前景。

关键词: 驱避剂, 白纹伊蚊, 避蚊胺, 羟哌酯, 驱蚊酯, 孟二醇

Abstract: Objective To explore the repellent effects of a new mosquito repellent at different concentrations in laboratory, and to compare the indoor repellent effects of formula with additives and other commonly used repellent components on Aedes albopictus, so as to provide an experimental basis for the development of new repellents. Methods The experimental methods were based on the Laboratory Efficacy Test Methods and Criterions of Public Health Insecticides for Pesticide Registration-Part 9: Repellent (GB/T 13917.9-2009). Excel 2007 software was used for data entry and SPSS 22.0 software for statistical analysis. Multivariate repeated measures analysis of variance was used to test the difference in the repellent time of the new repellent and ethanol at various concentrations. The paired samples t-test was used to compare the difference in the repellent time between ethanol solution and the new repellent formula. Random block design and analysis of variance were used to test the differences in the repellent time of the new repellent formula and commonly used repellents against mosquitoes. Results The repellent effect of the new repellent increased with increasing concentration. When the concentration of new repellent was 10%, the repellent time was more than 4 h, and when the concentration was 20%, the repellent time was more than 6 h. The repellent effect of 5% concentration [average repellent time (2.62±0.83) h] was lower than those of 12%, 15%, and 20% concentrations [average repellent time (5.13±1.05), (4.94±0.98), and (6.08±1.76) h, all P<0.05]. There was no significant difference in the repellent time of new repellent at other concentrations [average repellent time (4.91±1.17) h for 10% concentration, all P>0.05]. The repellent effect of formula with 15% ethanol [average repellent time (4.16±1.56) h] was lower than that of the formula with 50% ethanol [average repellent time (5.22±1.53) h, P<0.05]. There was no significant difference in the repellent time of formulas with other ethanol concentrations [average repellent time (4.69±1.59) h for 35% ethanol and (4.89±1.77) h for 75% ethanol, all P>0.05]. The interaction effect between the new repellent and ethanol was not statistically significant (F=0.849, P=0.601). The repellent time of new repellent formula was increased by 55.25%, 16.73%, 11.89%, and 9.91% compared with that of 12% ethanol solution (prepared from 15%, 35%, 50% and 75% ethanol preparations). The repellent effect of new repellent formula [repellent time (6.21±0.97) h] was higher than those of 4.5% IR3535 [repellent time (2.89±0.83) h] and 7% N,N-diethyl-meta-toluamide [repellent time (3.54±0.96) h], lower than that of 10% picaridin [repellent time (7.65±0.28) h], and between those of plant essential oil containing p-menthane-3,8-diol [repellent time (5.45±0.75) h] and 15% N,N-diethyl-meta-toluamide [repellent time (6.94±1.41) h]. Conclusion The repellent activity of the new repellent has been verified in laboratory, and the new repellent has a good application prospect.

Key words: Repellent, Aedes albopictus, N,N-diethyl-meta-toluamide, Picaridin, IR3535, p-Menthane-3,8-diol

中图分类号:

刘曜, 刘锐, 张杰, 姚隽一, 张宸罡, 李鑫, 吴寰宇, 刘洪霞. 新型驱避配方的筛选及对白纹伊蚊室内驱避效果研究[J]. 中国媒介生物学及控制杂志, 2024, 35(4): 411-416.

LIU Yao, LIU Rui, ZHANG Jie, YAO Jun-yi, ZHANG Chen-gang, LI Xin, WU Huan-yu, LIU Hong-xia. Screening for a new mosquito repellent formula and its repellent effect against Aedes albopictus in laboratory[J]. Chinese Journal of Vector Biology and Control, 2024, 35(4): 411-416.

参考文献

[1] Tang XW. Research progress of plant essential oil in mosquito control[J]. Yunnan Chem Technol,2019,46(5):15-17. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1004-275X.2019.05.006.(in Chinese)唐小文. 植物精油防控蚊的研究进展[J]. 云南化工,2019,46(5):15-17. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1004-275X.2019.05.006.
[2] Yang SR, Liu QY. Trend in global distribution and spread of Aedes albopictus[J]. Chin J Vector Biol Control,2013,24(1):1-4. (in Chinese)杨舒然,刘起勇. 白纹伊蚊的全球分布及扩散趋势[J]. 中国媒介生物学及控制杂志,2013,24(1):1-4.
[3] Guo YH, Xiu PC, Ma XR,et al. Repellent effects of different concentrations of new mosquito repellent against Aedes albopictus[J]. Chin J Vector Biol Control,2020,31(5):552-554. DOI:10.11853/j.issn.1003.8280.2020.05.010.(in Chinese)郭玉红,修朋程,马欣然,等. 新型驱蚊剂不同浓度制剂对白纹伊蚊的驱避效果研究[J]. 中国媒介生物学及控制杂志,2020,31(5):552-554. DOI:10.11853/j.issn. 1003. 8280. 2020. 05.010.
[4] General Administration of Quality Supervision,Inspection and Quarantine of the People's Republic of China,Standardization Administration of China. GB/T 31721-2015Vector control terms and classification[S]. Beijing:Standards Press of China,2016. (in Chinese)中华人民共和国国家质量监督检验检疫总局,中国国家标准化管理委员会. GB/T 31721—2015病媒生物控制术语与分类[S]. 北京:中国标准出版社,2016.
[5] Costantini C, Badolo A, Ilboudo-Sanogo E. Field evaluation of the efficacy and persistence of insect repellents DEET,IR3535,and KBR 3023 against Anopheles gambiae complex and other Afrotropical vector mosquitoes[J]. Trans Roy Soc Trop Med Hyg,2004,98(11):644-652. DOI:10.1016/j.trstmh.2003.12.015.
[6] Novica S, Radmila M. Insect repellents-transmissive disease vectors prevention[J]. Vojnosanit Pregl,2013,70(9):854-860. DOI:10.2298/vsp1309854 s.
[7] Zheng J, Chen C. Efficacy evaluation of three different kinds of repellent[J]. Chin J Hyg Insect Equip,2010,16(5):342-343,346. DOI:10.19821/j.issn.1671-2781.2010.05.004.(in Chinese)郑剑,陈超. 3种驱避剂驱蚊效果的评价研究[J]. 中华卫生杀虫药械,2010,16(5):342-343,346. DOI:10.19821/j.issn.1671-2781.2010.05.004.
[8] Zhao C, Yue ZG, Huang B,et al. Preparation and content determination of IR3535 long-term repellent[J]. J Henan Agric Sci,2021,50(2):162-166. DOI:10.15933/j.cnki.1004-3268. 2021.02.020.(in Chinese)赵聪,岳治光,黄斌,等. 驱蚊酯长效驱避剂的制备及其含量测定[J]. 河南农业科学,2021,50(2):162-166. DOI:10.15933/j.cnki.1004-3268.2021.02.020.
[9] Tian Y, Chen HN, Liu DP,et al. Repellent activity of plant-derived p-menthane-3,8-diol to Aedes albopictus in laboratory[J]. Chin J Hyg Insect Equip,2019,25(6):546-548. DOI:10.19821/j.issn.1671-2781.2019.06.011.(in Chinese)田野,陈红娜,刘大鹏,等. 植物源驱避剂孟二醇对白纹伊蚊的实验室药效研究[J]. 中华卫生杀虫药械,2019,25(6):546-548. DOI:10.19821/j.issn.1671-2781.2019.06.011.
[10] Wang C, Gou Y, Fan RY,et al. Progress on mosquito repellent plants based on ethnobotany literature[J]. Chin J Vector Biol Control,2018,29(5):530-538. DOI:10.11853/j.issn. 1003. 8280.2018.05.030.(in Chinese)王趁,苟祎,范汝艳,等. 驱蚊植物的民族植物学研究进展[J]. 中国媒介生物学及控制杂志,2018,29(5):530-538. DOI:10.11853/j.issn.1003.8280.2018.05.030.
[11] Liu SJ, Tan WL. Efficacy observation of four kinds of DEET repellents on mosquitoes[J]. Chin J Hyg Insect Equip,2009,15(2):104-105. DOI:10.19821/j.1671-2781.2009.02.008.(in Chinese)刘士军,谭伟龙. 4种避蚊胺驱蚊剂型实验室和现场驱蚊效果观察[J]. 中华卫生杀虫药械,2009,15(2):104-105. DOI:10.19821/j.1671-2781.2009.02.008.
[12] Shi WG, Xu ZM, Huang QZ,et al. Experimental observations on repelling effectiveness of seven kinds of repellents[J]. Chin J Vector Biol Control,1999,10(6):420-422. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1003-4692.1999.06.008.(in Chinese)史卫国,徐之明,黄清臻,等. 7种驱避剂驱蚊效果实验观察[J]. 中国媒介生物学及控制杂志,1999,10(6):420-422. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1003-4692.1999.06.008.
[13] Wang Y, Li TT, Gong MQ. Advances in research on olfactory receptors of mosquitoes[J]. Chin J Parasitol Parasit Dis,2020,38(5):647-652. DOI:10.12140/j.issn.1000-7423.2020.05.019.(in Chinese)王洋,李婷婷,公茂庆. 蚊虫嗅觉受体研究进展[J]. 中国寄生虫学与寄生虫病杂志,2020,38(5):647-652. DOI:10.12140/j.issn.1000-7423.2020.05.019.
[14] Xu XZ, Weng YH, Lu PY,et al. The research progress in action mechanism and quantitative structure-activity relationship of mosquito repellents[J]. Chin J Hyg Insect Equip,2015,21(2):194-197. DOI:10.19821/j.1671-2781.2015.02.029.(in Chinese)许锡招,翁玉辉,卢平英,等. 蚊虫驱避剂作用机理及定量构效关系研究进展[J]. 中华卫生杀虫药械,2015,21(2):194-197. DOI:10.19821/j.1671-2781.2015.02.029.
[15] Syed Z, Leal WS. Maxillary palps are broad spectrum odorant detectors in Culex quinquefasciatus[J]. Chem Senses,2007,32(8):727-738. DOI:10.1093/chemse/bjm040.
[16] Fleischer J, Pregitzer P, Breer H,et al. Access to the odor world:Olfactory receptors and their role for signal transduction in insects[J]. Cell Mol Life Sci,2018,75(3):485-508. DOI:10.1007/s00018-017-2627-5.
[17] Chertemps T, Younus F, Steiner C, et al. An antennal carboxylesterase from Drosophila melanogaster,esterase 6,is a candidate odorant-degrading enzyme toward food odorants[J]. Front Physiol,2015,6:315. DOI:10.3389/fphys.2015.00315.
[18] Zeng P, Wei PZ, Yang YL,et al. Repellent effect of five repellents against Aedes albopictus[J]. Chin J Hyg Insect Equip,2022,28(4):309-311. DOI:10.19821/j.1671-2781.2022.04.005.(in Chinese)曾平,魏盼中,阳亚玲,等. 5种驱避剂对白纹伊蚊的驱避活性[J]. 中华卫生杀虫药械,2022,28(4):309-311. DOI:10.19821/j.1671-2781.2022.04.005.
[19] Chen DH, Zhou TL, Ye XL,et al. Efficacy of different repellents on Aedes aegypti[J]. Chin J Hyg Insect Equip,2018,24(6):539-541. DOI:10.19821/j.1671-2781.2018.06.007.(in Chinese)陈德华,周泰霖,叶晓磊,等. 几种驱避剂对埃及伊蚊驱避效果的研究[J]. 中华卫生杀虫药械,2018,24(6):539-541. DOI:10.19821/j.1671-2781.2018.06.007.
[20] Mapossa AB, Focke WW, Tewo RK,et al. Mosquito-repellent controlled-release formulations for fighting infectious diseases[J]. Malar J,2021,20(1):165. DOI:10.1186/s12936-021-03681-7.
[21] Zhang WL, Peng H, Shan WQ,et al. Research progress on safety of repellents[J]. Chin J Vector Biol Control,2022,33(4):601-607. DOI:10.11853/j.issn.1003.8280.2022.04.029.(in Chinese)张婉莉,彭恒,单文琪,等. 驱避剂安全性研究进展[J]. 中国媒介生物学及控制杂志,2022,33(4):601-607. DOI:10.11853/j.issn.1003.8280.2022.04.029.
[22] Zhu W, Liu Y, Liu XY,et al. Trend in resistance to beta-cypermethrin in Aedes albopictus and preliminary strategies of betacypermethrin use in Xuhui District,Shanghai[J]. Shanghai J Prev Med,2022,34(7):699-704. DOI:10.19428/j.cnki.sjpm.2022.21659.(in Chinese)朱伟,刘曜,刘翔宇,等. 白纹伊蚊对高效氯氰菊酯的抗性变化趋势与用药策略的初步研究[J]. 上海预防医学,2022,34(7):699-704. DOI:10.19428/j.cnki.sjpm.2022.21659.

新型驱避配方的筛选及对白纹伊蚊室内驱避效果研究

Screening for a new mosquito repellent formula and its repellent effect against Aedes albopictus in laboratory

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	郎静, 赵怡双, 张惠芬, 陈财荣. 不同pH值的水环境对白纹伊蚊生长发育的影响[J]. 中国媒介生物学及控制杂志, 2024, 35(4): 401-404.
[2]	朱彩英, 赵春春, 王纯玉, 陈建勇, 肖珊, 王文强, 孟凤霞. 湖南省长沙市内五区白纹伊蚊电压门控钠离子通道基因突变研究[J]. 中国媒介生物学及控制杂志, 2024, 35(4): 405-410.
[3]	刘仰青, 付仁龙, 杨树, 李辉. 江西省南昌市2020和2023年白纹伊蚊对常用杀虫剂的抗药性监测[J]. 中国媒介生物学及控制杂志, 2024, 35(4): 451-456.
[4]	龚君淘, 梁自勉, 韦迎阳, 游建文, 江文锋, 奚志勇. 沃尔巴克氏体不育蚊在登革热高风险社区的现场应用[J]. 中国媒介生物学及控制杂志, 2024, 35(3): 287-292.
[5]	张铭洧, 段金花, 邓惠, 芦瑞鹏, 陈宗晶, 林立丰. 聚二甲基硅氧烷水膜对3种蚊虫的实验室控制效果研究[J]. 中国媒介生物学及控制杂志, 2024, 35(2): 133-137.
[6]	王淼, 简藓懿, 刘庆, 梁国锐, 谢静文, 王明, 姜玉庭, 赵彤言, 郭晓霞. 低温和短日照诱导白纹伊蚊滞育的代谢适应研究[J]. 中国媒介生物学及控制杂志, 2024, 35(2): 145-149.
[7]	周楚楚, 刘静, 何鸿阳, 冯波. 苯乙醇及二氢茉莉酮对白纹伊蚊的驱避效果研究[J]. 中国媒介生物学及控制杂志, 2024, 35(2): 150-155.
[8]	霍锡元, 张晔, 刘国军, 苑森梅, 韩雪峰, 赵春春, 孟凤霞. 山东省潍坊市2022年白纹伊蚊击倒抗性基因型分布研究[J]. 中国媒介生物学及控制杂志, 2024, 35(2): 156-160.
[9]	叶独秋, 庞博文, 蒋露芳, 陶骏捷, 张驰, 李萌, 吕锡宏. 上海市松江区2017－2022年白纹伊蚊分布特征及时空聚集性分析[J]. 中国媒介生物学及控制杂志, 2024, 35(2): 171-176.
[10]	夏光辉, 汪如良, 刘晓青, 潘欢弘, 张天琛. 江西省2015－2022年登革热媒介伊蚊幼蚊监测结果分析[J]. 中国媒介生物学及控制杂志, 2024, 35(2): 182-187.
[11]	王墩家, 蔡逸舟, 董琳娟, 王飞, 赵楚雯, 侯正兴, 朱敏慧, 周毅彬. 基于空间分层抽样的蚊虫路径指数法抽样方法研究[J]. 中国媒介生物学及控制杂志, 2024, 35(2): 225-231.
[12]	杨罗菊, 岳巧云, 刘德星, 胡佳, 陈健, 邱德义. 广东省中山市城区白纹伊蚊对拟除虫菊酯类杀虫剂的抗药性及其抗性基因突变分析[J]. 中国媒介生物学及控制杂志, 2024, 35(2): 237-243.
[13]	南晓伟, 王珊珊, 陈继来, 司晓艳, 吕威, 郭之君, 乔丽红, 王大伟, 王文瑞. 内蒙古首次采获白纹伊蚊的形态学与分子生物学鉴定[J]. 中国媒介生物学及控制杂志, 2024, 35(1): 109-114.
[14]	侯银续, 张燕婕, 王文君, 仰凤桃, 刘小波, 孟凤霞, 徐庆华. 安徽省合肥市2021年登革热媒介白纹伊蚊对常用杀虫剂的抗药性水平[J]. 中国媒介生物学及控制杂志, 2023, 34(6): 749-753.
[15]	傅菁文, 刘文娟, 张忠, 张瑞玲. miR-276-3p在白纹伊蚊幼虫几丁质代谢调控中的作用研究[J]. 中国媒介生物学及控制杂志, 2023, 34(5): 589-595.