中国媒介生物学及控制杂志 ›› 2018, Vol. 29 ›› Issue (3): 263-266.DOI: 10.11853/j.issn.1003.8280.2018.03.011

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

湖北省2014-2016年城市病媒生物密度控制水平的比较及启示

姚璇, 熊进峰, 黄晓波   

  1. 湖北省疾病预防控制中心传染病防治研究所消毒与病媒控制部, 武汉 430079
  • 收稿日期:2018-02-24 出版日期:2018-06-20 发布日期:2018-06-20
  • 作者简介:姚璇,女,主任医师,主要从事媒介生物学研究,Email:491028336@qq.com

Comparison and revelation of vector density criteria for urban vector control in 2014-2016, Hubei province, China

YAO Xuan, XIONG Jin-feng, HUANG Xiao-bo   

  1. Hubei Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Wuhan 430079, Hubei Province, China
  • Received:2018-02-24 Online:2018-06-20 Published:2018-06-20

摘要: 目的 比较分析湖北省2014-2016年城市病媒生物密度控制水平的考核结果,为各地创建卫生城市和病媒生物控制策略的制定提供依据。方法 收集2014-2016年湖北省49个市(县)的病媒生物密度控制水平的考核结果,统计总体通过率和评级情况,采用SPSS 19.0软件的Kruskal-Wallis H检验,比较分析鼠、蚊、蝇、蜚蠊密度控制4个项目及其相关指标的评级构成。结果 病媒生物密度控制考核一次性全达标率为89.80%,非一次性达标的主要原因为蝇密度控制未达到评估水平的C级。全达标城市的鼠、蜚蠊密度控制水平主要获评等级为B级,构成比分别为57.14%和59.18%;蚊、蝇密度控制水平主要获评等级为C级,构成比分别为69.39%和67.35%,项目间等级构成比差异有统计学意义(H=71.103,P=0.000);A级水平构成比较低的为鼠、蚊、蝇。防鼠、防蝇设施和小型积水蚊密度为控制的难点。结论 控制城市病媒生物密度在国家标准以内,需加强组织领导、建立保障机制、部门协调与配合及发动居民参与;城市病媒生物管理应在逐项落实各指标的前提下,加强重点和难点的控制,提高整体控制水平。

关键词: 病媒生物, 密度控制, 卫生管理, 比较

Abstract: Objective To compare and analyze the results of urban vector control in Hubei province during 2014-2016, to provide basis for city health strategy and urban vector control strategy. Methods To collect the results of the assessment of vector control in 49 cities of Hubei province from 2014 to 2016, then compare and analyze the density indicators of the vector control, on the 4 pests of rodents, mosquitoes, flies, and cockroaches. Results Four projects to control the density of rodents, mosquitoes, flies and cockroaches, by one-time assessment full compliance rate was 89.80%. The main reason for the non-one-time standard was that the fly density control failed to reach the level C. In full compliance city, rodent, cockroach density control level was rated grade B, accounted for 57.14% and 59.18%. The main level of control of mosquito and fly density was grade C, and the proportion of density was 69.39% and 67.35%, respectively. The difference between the items was statistically significant (H=71.103, P=0.000); rodents, mosquitoes and flies got relatively lower composition ratio of level A. The rodent and fly prevention facilities, and the mosquito density in small-scale ponding were difficult to control. Conclusion The density of city vector should be controlled within the national standard. There is a need to strengthen organizational leadership and establish the quality control mechanism. Departments should coordinate and motivate the participation of the public. The management of city vector should be on the basis of the implementation of the control standard, enhancement of the key and the difficult points, as well as the overall level.

Key words: Vector, Density control, Health management, Comparison

中图分类号: