中国媒介生物学及控制杂志 ›› 2012, Vol. 23 ›› Issue (6): 522-524.

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

蝇类监测中不同饵料诱蝇效果的对比研究

徐友祥1, 冷培恩2, 王韶华1, 武峥嵘1, 方伟1, 张书志1   

  1. 1. 上海市嘉定区疾病预防控制中心, 上海 201800;
    2. 上海市疾病预防控制中心, 上海 200336
  • 收稿日期:2012-09-03 出版日期:2012-12-20 发布日期:2012-12-20
  • 通讯作者: 冷培恩,Email:peleng@scdc.sh.cn
  • 基金资助:
    国家科技重大专项课题(2008ZX10004-010)

Fly-luring effects of different baits in fly monitoring: a comparative study

XU You-xiang1, LENG Pei-en2, WANG Shao-hua1, WU Zheng-rong1, FANG Wei1, ZHANG Shu-zhi1   

  1. 1. Jiading Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Shanghai 201800, China;
    2. Shanghai Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Shanghai 200336, China
  • Received:2012-09-03 Online:2012-12-20 Published:2012-12-20
  • Supported by:
    Supported by the Major National Science and Technology Projects of China (No. 2008ZX10004-010)

摘要: 目的 了解不同配方饵料对蝇类的诱捕效果, 探索蝇类监测饵料的商品化和标准化。方法 用果酱、甜面酱、红糖、奶粉、腐鱼膏剂和鱼粉6种材料, 按不同比例配置成9个配方, 现场笼诱法比较配方的诱蝇效果。结果 通过4-11月每月3次轮换试验, 5号配方(腐鱼膏剂+甜面酱)对大头金蝇诱获率最高;6号配方(腐鱼膏剂+红糖+奶粉)对家蝇诱获率最高, 家蝇占诱蝇总数的29.3%, 经χ2检验, 6号与1~3、5号差异有统计学意义, 与4、7~9号差异无统计学意义。经Student-Newman-Keuls统计分析, 6号配方优于其他配方, 即6号>(9号、7号、4号、8号)>2号>3号>5号>1号。结论 6号配方优于其他配方, 可应用于现场蝇类监测对比试验, 进一步验证其对家蝇和其它监测蝇种的引诱效果。

关键词: 饵料, 蝇类, 监测

Abstract: Objective To investigate the luring effects of different formulae of fly baits, and to explore the commercialization and standardization of baits for fly monitoring. Methods Nine formulae of fly baits were prepared from jam, sweet bean sauce, brown sugar, milk powder, putrid fish paste, and fish meal at different ratios. The fly- luring effects of the fly baits were compared by cage trap method. Results Formula 5 (rotten fish paste+sweet bean paste) had the highest trapping rate for Chrysomya megacephala, and formula 6 (rotten fish paste+brown sugar+milk powder) had the highest trapping rate for Musca domestica, as shown by the test which was performed at 3 rotations per month for 4-11 months. M. domestica accounted for 29.3% of all captured flies. The chi-square test revealed that formula 6 was significantly different from formulae 1-3 and 5, but without significant differences from formulae 4 and 7-9. The Student-Newman-Keuls test showed that formula 6 was better than other formulae, i.e., formula 6>formulae 9, 7, 4, and 8>formula 2>formula 3>formula 5>formula 1. Conclusion Formula 6 is better than other formulas and thus can be used for field fly monitoring and comparison. Further investigation deserves to test its luring effects on M. domestica and other fly species.

Key words: Bait, Fly, Monitoring

中图分类号: