中国媒介生物学及控制杂志 ›› 2010, Vol. 21 ›› Issue (5): 478-481.

• 技术方法 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于SAS的杀虫剂毒力筛选计算机实现

裘炯良1,颜艳2,郑剑宁1   

  1. 1. 宁波出入境检验检疫局卫生检疫监管处(浙江宁波315012);
    2. 中南大学公共卫生学院
  • 收稿日期:2010-03-22 出版日期:2010-10-20 发布日期:2010-10-20
  • 作者简介:裘炯良(1975-),男,硕士研究生,主要从事卫生检疫与传染性流行病学研究。Email: qiujl@nbciq.gov.cn
  • 基金资助:

    国家质检总局科研项目(2003IK062)

SAS-based computer screening of insecticidal toxicity

QIU Jiong-liang1, YAN Yan2, ZHENG Jian-ning1   

  1. 1. Department of Health and Quarantine, Ningbo Inspection and Quarantine Bureau, Ningbo 315012, Zhejiang Province, China;
    2. School of Public Health, Central South University
  • Received:2010-03-22 Online:2010-10-20 Published:2010-10-20
  • Supported by:

    Supported by the AQSIQ Science and Technology Projects(No. 2003IK062)

摘要:

目的 采用国际通用的SAS统计分析平台编制计算机程序,实现杀虫剂毒力的快速筛选。方法 以德国小蠊为试虫,对A、B 2种杀虫剂进行室内熏蒸毒力测定,对所得数据进行计算机程序演算,以加权概率单位法拟合毒力回归线,计算2种药剂的LC50及其95%置信限(95%CI),并对2种药剂LC50及毒力回归线斜率进行两两分析比较。结果 A、B药剂杀灭德国小蠊的毒力回归线分别为Y(probit)=-3.193+5.005×Log10(dose)和Y(probit)=-2.498+2.696×Log10(dose);参数效应Wald χ2检验的P值均<0.01,方程拟合优度检验的P值均>0.05。2种药剂的LC50值分别为4.35 g/m3(95%CI:3.17~5.29 g/m3)和8.44 g/m3(95%CI:6.07~10.66 g/m3);毒力线斜率分别为5.005 和2.696。A、B 药剂LC50 两两比较结果:u=3.415,P<0.001;斜率间两两比较结果:t=2.028,P<0.05。提示从药剂的毒力和虫群敏感性而言,A药剂均强于B药剂。结论 建立的快速筛选方法及编制的程序计算结果经双重验证,证明准确、可靠,且简便、快捷。

关键词: 毒力测定, 筛选, SAS, 程序, 熏蒸

Abstract:

Objective A computer program was formulated on the internationally recognized platform of statistics analysis system (SAS) for rapid screening of pesticide toxicity. Methods Two insecticides, A and B, were tested for the toxicity against Blattella germanica using indoor fumigation. The resulting data were subject to computation by this program to fit a weighted probit regression line. The LC50 and 95% confidence interval (95%CI) of both agents were then calculated and compared in pair with the slope of the toxicity regression line. Results The toxicity regression lines of the two agents were Y(probit)= -3.193+5.005×Log10 (dose) and Y(probit)=-2.498+2.696×Log10 (dose). The Wald test showed both P values were <0.01, while the goodness-of-fit test showed both P values were >0.05. The LC50 values for the two pesticides were 4.35 g/m3 (95%CI: 3.17-5.29 g/m3) and 8.44 g/m3 (95%CI: 6.07-10.66 g/m3), respectively; the slopes of the two regression lines were 5.005 and 2.696, respectively. Comparison between the LC50 values showed: u=3.415, P<0.001; and that between slopes revealed: t=2.028, P< 0.05. These results suggested that agent A was stronger than B in both toxicity and sensitivity. Conclusion Through dual verification, the established method and computer program proved to be accurate, reliable, and simple and fast for rapid screening of insecticidal toxicity.

Key words: Toxicity measurement, Screening, Statistics analysis system, Program, Fumigation

中图分类号: